Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
Bian, Zheng; Qu, Xiaoxian; Ying, Hao; Liu, Xiaohua.
  • Bian Z; Department of Obstetrics, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Qu X; Department of Obstetrics, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Ying H; Department of Obstetrics, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Liu X; Department of Obstetrics, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China annaabcd114@hotmail.com.
BMJ Glob Health ; 6(8)2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356933
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Preterm birth is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China on 23 January 2020 on the incidence of preterm birth in our institution.

DESIGN:

Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the national COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China and the incidence of preterm birth.

SETTING:

Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai China.

PARTICIPANTS:

All singleton deliveries abstracted from electronic medical record between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Preterm birth rate.

RESULTS:

Data on 164 107 singleton deliveries were available. COVID-19 mitigation measures were consistently associated with significant reductions in preterm birth in the 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month time windows after implementation (+2 months, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94; +3 months, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94; +4 months, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92; +5 months, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93). These reductions in preterm birth were obvious across various degrees of prematurity, but were statistically significant only in moderate-to-late preterm birth (32 complete weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days) subgroup. The preterm birth difference disappeared gradually after various restrictions were removed (7th-12th month of 2020, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.11). There was no difference in stillbirth rate across the study time window.

CONCLUSION:

Substantial decreases in preterm birth rates were observed following implementation of the national COVID-19 mitigation measures in China. Further study is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms associated with this observation.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Premature Birth / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2021-006359

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Premature Birth / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2021-006359