Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prevalence and significance of pulmonary disease on lung ultrasonography in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Fairchild, Robert M; Horomanski, Audra; Mar, Diane A; Triant, Gabriela R; Lu, Rong; Lu, Di; Guo, Haiwei Henry; Baker, Matthew C.
  • Fairchild RM; Department of Immunology & Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA rfairchi@stanford.edu.
  • Horomanski A; Department of Immunology & Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Mar DA; Department of Immunology & Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Triant GR; Department of Immunology & Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Lu R; Quantitative Sciences Unit, Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Lu D; Quantitative Sciences Unit, Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Guo HH; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Baker MC; Department of Immunology & Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 8(1)2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356953
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The majority of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are diagnosed and managed as outpatients; however, little is known about the burden of pulmonary disease in this setting. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a convenient tool for detection of COVID-19 pneumonia. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infected outpatients with pulmonary disease may be important for early risk stratification.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the prevalence, natural history and clinical significance of pulmonary disease in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS:

SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive outpatients (CV(+)) were assessed with LUS to identify the presence of interstitial pneumonia. Studies were considered positive based on the presence of B-lines, pleural irregularity and consolidations. A subset of patients underwent longitudinal examinations. Correlations between LUS findings and patient symptoms, demographics, comorbidities and clinical outcomes over 8 weeks were evaluated.

RESULTS:

102 CV(+) patients underwent LUS with 42 (41%) demonstrating pulmonary involvement. Baseline LUS severity scores correlated with shortness of breath on multivariate analysis. Of the CV(+) patients followed longitudinally, a majority showed improvement or resolution in LUS findings after 1-2 weeks. Only one patient in the CV(+) cohort was briefly hospitalised, and no patient died or required mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSION:

We found a high prevalence of LUS findings in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given the pervasiveness of pulmonary disease across a broad spectrum of LUS severity scores and lack of adverse outcomes, our findings suggest that LUS may not be a useful as a risk stratification tool in SARS-CoV-2 in the general outpatient population.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Lung Diseases Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjresp-2021-000947

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Lung Diseases Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjresp-2021-000947