Missing the window of opportunity: Early arthritis clinics in times of COVID-19

ABSTRACT

Background: The outcomes of patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis (IA), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have dramatically improved over the past 20 years. Earlier identification of IA and prompter treatment institution have been key advancements, promoted by the constitution of Early Arthritis Clinics (EAC) and the development of more sensitive classification criteria for RA. The outbreak of new COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly become a global health emergency and has forced a rearrangement in the management of other non-COVID-19 diseases. The impact of the lock-down of the healthcare systems on chronic inflammatory diseases such as RA is expected to be significant but is at present unknown. Objectives: To assess the effects of the lock-down imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the referral and clinical presentation of patients with new-onset RA. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Pavia EAC inception cohort, established in 2005 for the early identification of patients with new-onset IA. Referral criteria to the EAC include ≥3 swollen joints (SJ) and/or <3 SJ and positive squeeze test and/or <3 SJ and morning stiffness ≥30 min. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are assessed at baseline and regularly over follow-up. At 31 Dec 2020, the Pavia EAC collects information on 2.508 patients. For this study, baseline characteristics of the patients referred in the semester following the COVID-19 lock-down (Jul-Dec 2020) were compared with (i) patients referred in the semester immediately preceding the lock-down (Jul-Dec 2019);(ii) patients referred in the semester following the publication of the 2010 RA classification criteria (Jan-Jun 2011);(iii) patients referred in the semester preceding the publication of the 2010 criteria (Jul-Dec 2009). Results: In the semester following the lock-down imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decrease in the referral of patients with new-onset suspected IA compared with previous periods (n=71 vs n=91 in the semester before the lock-down, n=96 in the first semester of 2011, n=101 in the second semester of 2009). Furthermore, fewer of the referred patients fulfilled RA criteria at presentation (36.6% vs 44.3%, 46.5% and 42.9% in the other semesters). Among patients with RA, more were autoantibody-positive (72% vs 50%, 49.1% and 52.2%). There was a trend for increased diagnostic delay in the overall cohort of RA after the COVID-19 lock-down (Figure 1A). The delay was particularly longer in autoantibody-positive patients, returning to the values seen before the introduction of the 2010 RA criteria (Figure 1B). In contrast, the few autoantibody-negative patients were referred earlier (Figure 1C). Disease activity at presentation was significantly higher in RA patients presenting after the lock-down compared with the progressive trend for reduction observed over the previous years, irrespective of the autoantibody status (Figure 1D-F). Such increase was determined by an inversion of the trend towards lower levels of objective parameters of inflammation, such as the swollen joint count (Figure 1G-I) and acute phase reactants, and a further increase in the secular trend towards worsening of patient-derived measures, such as the tender joint count and patient global assessment (Figure 1J-L). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic is posing unprecedented challenges in the management of patients suffering from chronic diseases. RA has returned to be diagnosed outside the window of opportunity, with a significantly higher inflammatory burden at presentation. The many benefits of early diagnosis, which have dramatically changed the outcomes of autoantibody-positive RA, are at risk of vanishing in short times. Equally important, autoantibody-negative RA is at risk of further under-diagnosis and under-treatment.