Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Edoxaban for the treatment of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Langella, Valerio; Bottino, Roberta; Asti, Antonio; Maresca, Giulio; Di Palma, Gisella; Pomponi, Domenico; Sassone, Claudia; Imbalzano, Egidio; Russo, Vincenzo.
  • Langella V; Internal Medicine Unit - COVID19 Emergency Department, S. Maria Di Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  • Bottino R; Cardiology Unit, Department Of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  • Asti A; Internal Medicine Unit - COVID19 Emergency Department, S. Maria Di Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  • Maresca G; Internal Medicine Unit - COVID19 Emergency Department, S. Maria Di Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  • Di Palma G; Internal Medicine Unit - COVID19 Emergency Department, S. Maria Di Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  • Pomponi D; Internal Medicine Unit - COVID19 Emergency Department, S. Maria Di Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  • Sassone C; Anesthesiology, Intensive Care And Pain Treatment Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
  • Imbalzano E; Department Of Clinical And Experimental Medicine, University Of Messina, Messina, Italy.
  • Russo V; Cardiology Unit, Department Of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 14(10): 1289-1294, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1360277
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We aimed to investigate the clinical performance of edoxaban for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective analysis selecting hospitalized patients with COVID-19 admitted to our Institution from 20 May 2020 to 20 November 2020 with computer tomography (CT) detected PE at admission, treated with edoxaban after initial parenteral therapy. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without ARDS at admission and between those with and without CT confirmed PE resolution.

RESULTS:

50 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 42.5 ± 10 days. No baseline differences were found between patients with ARDS (30%) and those without ARDS at admission. Patients with PE resolution (84%) were younger (P = 0.03), had a shorter duration of fondaparinux therapy (9.9 ± 3.8 vs 15.8 ± 7.5 days; P = 0.0015) and length of hospitalization (36 ± 8 vs 46 ± 9 days P = 0.0023) compared with those without PE resolution. 2 patients experienced major bleedings. At multivariate analysis the time to edoxaban switch was the only predictor of the PE resolution (HR 0.92; 95% C.I. 0.86 to 0.99).

CONCLUSION:

Edoxaban was an effective and safe treatment for acute PE in COVID-19 setting.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Pyridines / Thiazoles / Factor Xa Inhibitors / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 17512433.2021.1964359

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Pyridines / Thiazoles / Factor Xa Inhibitors / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 17512433.2021.1964359