Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Development and validation of a tool to appraise guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 infection control strategies in healthcare workers.
Subramaniam, Ashwin; Ponnapa Reddy, Mallikarjuna; Kadam, Umesh; Zubarev, Alexander; Lim, Zheng; Anstey, Chris; Bihari, Shailesh; Haji, Jumana; Luo, Jinghang; Mitra, Saikat; Ramanathan, Kollengode; Rajamani, Arvind; Rubulotta, Francesca; Svensk, Erik; Shekar, Kiran.
  • Subramaniam A; Frankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC Australia; The Bays Hospital, Mornington, VIC Australia; Monash University, Frankston, VIC Australia. Electronic address: ashwin.subramaniam@monash.edu.
  • Ponnapa Reddy M; Frankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC Australia; The Bays Hospital, Mornington, VIC Australia; Calvary Public Hospital, ACT, Canberra, Australia. Electronic address: malli_ponnu@yahoo.co.in.
  • Kadam U; Werribee Mercy Hospital, Werribee, VIC, Australia; Casey Monash Hospital, Berwick, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: umesh555@yahoo.co.uk.
  • Zubarev A; Frankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC Australia. Electronic address: dr.zubarev.alexander@gmail.com.
  • Lim Z; Austin Health VIC, Heidelburg, Australia. Electronic address: zhengjie.lim@icloud.com.
  • Anstey C; Griffith University, University of Queensland, Qld Australia. Electronic address: c.anstey@griffith.edu.au.
  • Bihari S; Flinders University and Flinders Medical Center, SA, Australia. Electronic address: biharishailesh@gmail.com.
  • Haji J; Aster CMI Hospital, Bangalore, India. Electronic address: drjyhaji@gmail.com.
  • Luo J; Western Health, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: Jinghangluo@hotmail.com.
  • Mitra S; National University Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: smsaikatmitra1@gmail.com.
  • Ramanathan K; National University Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: Ram_ramanathan@nuhs.edu.sg.
  • Rajamani A; University of Sydney, Nepean Clinical School and Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: rrarvind@hotmail.com.
  • Rubulotta F; Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: frubulotta@hotmail.com.
  • Svensk E; Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden. Electronic address: erik.svensk@rvn.se.
  • Shekar K; Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; Bond University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia. Electronic address: Kiran.shekar@health.qld.gov.au.
Aust Crit Care ; 35(4): 415-423, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1361381
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical guidelines on infection control strategies in healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in protecting them during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Poorly constructed guidelines that are incomprehensive and/or ambiguous may compromise HCWs' safety.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a tool to appraise guidelines on infection control strategies in HCWs based on the guidelines published early in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

OUTCOMES:

A three-stage, web-based, Delphi consensus-building process among a panel of diverse HCWs and healthcare managers was performed. The tool was validated by appraising 40 international, specialty-specific, and procedure-specific guidelines along with national guidelines from countries with a wide range of gross national income.

RESULTS:

Overall consensus (≥75%) was reached at the end of three rounds for all six domains included in the tool. The Delphi panel recommended an ideal infection control guideline should encompass six domains general characteristics (domain 1), engineering recommendations (domain 2), personal protective equipment (PPE) use (domain 3), and administrative aspects (domain 4-6) of infection control. The appraisal tool performed well across the six domains, and the inter-rater agreement was excellent for the 40 guidelines. All included guidelines performed relatively better in domains 1-3 than in domains 4-6, and this was more evident in guidelines originating from lower income countries.

CONCLUSION:

The guideline appraisal tool was robust and easy to use. Engineering recommendations aspects of infection control, administrative measures that promote optimal PPE use, and HCW wellbeing were generally lacking in assessed guidelines. This tool may enable health systems to adopt high-quality HCW infection control guidelines during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and may also provide a framework for future guideline development.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Aust Crit Care Journal subject: Nursing / Critical Care Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Aust Crit Care Journal subject: Nursing / Critical Care Year: 2022 Document Type: Article