Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients.
Bruxvoort, Katia; Tenggardjaja, Christopher F; Slezak, Jeff; Gullett, Jonathan C; Broder, Benjamin; Park, Claire H; Aragones, Michael; Mercado, Cheryl; Wong, Katherine; McLaren, Steven; Jacobsen, Steven J.
  • Bruxvoort K; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA. Electronic address: Katia.Bruxvoort@kp.org.
  • Tenggardjaja CF; Department of Urology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 4867 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
  • Slezak J; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
  • Gullett JC; Regional Reference Laboratories, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 11668 Sherman Way, North Hollywood, CA 91605, USA.
  • Broder B; Department of Quality and Clinical Analysis, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 393 East Walnut Street, Pasadena, CA 91188, USA.
  • Park CH; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA; Currently with the Acute Communicable Disease Control Program, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, 313 North Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, California 9001
  • Aragones M; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
  • Mercado C; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
  • Wong K; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
  • McLaren S; Regional Reference Laboratories, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 11668 Sherman Way, North Hollywood, CA 91605, USA.
  • Jacobsen SJ; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 381-387, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1363848
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Provider-collected nasopharyngeal specimens for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) molecular testing are the standard of care in many clinical settings, but patient-collected saliva and anterior nares specimens are less invasive and more flexible alternatives. Prior studies comparing specimen types for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing have been limited by small sample sizes and low pretest probability. We conducted a large observational study among symptomatic adults at 7 emergency departments of Kaiser Permanente Southern California to examine sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests by specimen type and patient characteristics.

METHODS:

Provider-collected nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) specimens and patient-collected saliva and anterior nares specimens were collected at the same visit and analyzed with the Roche cobas® SARS-CoV-2 assay. Patients were considered truly positive for SARS-CoV-2 if any of the three specimens was positive and negative if all three specimens were negative. Factors associated with discordant and missed positive results were examined with multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS:

Of 2112 patients, 350 (16.6%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Sensitivity of NP/OP was 93.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.6%-96.0%), sensitivity of saliva was 87.7% (83.8%-91.0%), and sensitivity of anterior nares was 85.4% (81.3%-89.0%). Patients ages 18-39 years versus ≥40 years were more likely to have discordant results [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.97 (1.12-3.45)], as were patients with <4 symptoms versus ≥4 [aOR 2.43 (1.39-4.25)]. Cycle threshold values were higher for saliva and anterior nares than NP/OP specimens, as well as for specimens in discordant versus concordant sets and patients with fewer symptoms.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides robust evidence that patient-collected saliva and anterior nares are sensitive for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing in emergency department settings, particularly among adults ages ≥40 years and those with multiple symptoms. Higher sensitivity of provider-collected NP/OP specimens must be weighed against the benefits of patient-collected specimens in tailored strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Specimen Handling / Emergency Service, Hospital / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Young adult Language: English Journal: Am J Emerg Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Specimen Handling / Emergency Service, Hospital / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Young adult Language: English Journal: Am J Emerg Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article