Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model.
Aganovic, Amar; Bi, Yang; Cao, Guangyu; Drangsholt, Finn; Kurnitski, Jarek; Wargocki, Pawel.
  • Aganovic A; Department of Automation and Process Engineering, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Bi Y; Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Cao G; Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Drangsholt F; Department of Automation and Process Engineering, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Kurnitski J; REHVA Technology and Research Committee, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Wargocki P; Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Build Environ ; 205: 108278, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1370455
ABSTRACT
A novel modified version of the Wells-Riley model was used to estimate the impact of relative humidity (RH) on the removal of respiratory droplets containing the SARS-CoV-2 virus by deposition through gravitational settling and its inactivation by biological decay; the effect of RH on susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 was not considered. These effects were compared with the removal achieved by increased ventilation rate with outdoor air. Modeling was performed assuming that the infected person talked continuously for 60 and 120 min. The results of modeling showed that the relative impact of RH on the infection risk depended on the ventilation rate and the size range of virus-laden droplets. A ventilation rate of 0.5 ACH, the change of RH between 20% and 53% was predicted to have a small effect on the infection risk, while at a ventilation rate of 6 ACH this change had nearly no effect. On the contrary, increasing the ventilation rate from 0.5 ACH to 6 ACH was predicted to decrease the infection risk by half which is remarkably larger effect compared with that predicted for RH. It is thus concluded that increasing the ventilation rate is more beneficial for reducing the airborne levels of SARS-CoV-2 than changing indoor RH. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The present results show that humidification to moderate levels of 40%-60% RH should not be expected to provide a significant reduction in infection risk caused by SARS-CoV-2, hence installing and running humidifiers may not be an efficient solution to reduce the risk of COVID-19 disease in indoor spaces. The results do however confirm that ventilation has a key role in controlling SARS-CoV-2 virus concentration in the air providing considerably higher benefits. The modified model developed in the present work can be used by public health experts, engineers, and epidemiologists when selecting different measures to reduce the infection risk from SARS-CoV-2 indoors allowing informed decisions concerning indoor environmental control.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Build Environ Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.buildenv.2021.108278

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Build Environ Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.buildenv.2021.108278