Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay.
Riester, Elena; Findeisen, Peter; Hegel, J Kolja; Kabesch, Michael; Ambrosch, Andreas; Rank, Christopher M; Pessl, Florina; Laengin, Tina; Niederhauser, Christoph.
  • Riester E; Labor Augsburg MVZ GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Findeisen P; MVZ Labor Limbach, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Hegel JK; Labor Berlin, Charité Vivantes Services GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Kabesch M; University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO) at the Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John and the University Hospital, University of Regensburg, Germany.
  • Ambrosch A; Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology and Hygiene, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Rank CM; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Pessl F; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Laengin T; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Niederhauser C; Interregionale Blood Transfusion Swiss Red Cross, Bern, Switzerland; Institute for Infectious Diseases (IFIK), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: Christoph.Niederhauser@itransfusion.ch.
J Virol Methods ; 297: 114271, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1373176
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT
The Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) has been developed for the detection of antibodies to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein. We evaluated the assay performance using samples from seven sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. For specificity and sensitivity analyses, 7880 presumed negative pre-pandemic samples and 827 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed single or sequential samples from 272 different patients were tested, respectively. The overall specificity and sensitivity (≥14 days post-PCR) for the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay were 99.95% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.87-99.99; 7876/7880) and 97.92% (95% CI 95.21-99.32; 235/240), respectively. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay had significantly higher specificity compared with the LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (99.95% [2032/2033] vs 98.82% [2009/2033]), ADVIA Centaur® SARS-CoV-2 Total (100% [928/928] vs 86.96% [807/928]), ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG (99.97% [2931/2932] vs 99.69% [2923/2932]), iFlash-SARS-CoV-2 IgM (100.00% [928/928] vs 99.57% [924/928]), and EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (100.00% [903/903] vs 97.45% [880/903]) and IgA (100.00% [895/895] vs 95.75% [857/895]) assays. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay had significantly higher sensitivity (≥14 days post-PCR) compared with the ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG (98.70% [76/77] vs 87.01% [67/77]), iFlash-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (100.00% [76/76] vs 93.42% [71/76]) and IgM (100.00% [76/76] vs 35.53% [27/76]), and EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (98.26% [113/115] vs 93.91% [108/115]) assays. Therefore, the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay demonstrated a reliable performance across various sample populations for the detection of anti-S antibodies.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Virol Methods Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jviromet.2021.114271

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Virol Methods Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jviromet.2021.114271