Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Household Secondary Attack Rate of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): A Rapid Review.
Fung, Hannah F; Martinez, Leonardo; Alarid-Escudero, Fernando; Salomon, Joshua A; Studdert, David M; Andrews, Jason R; Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.
  • Fung HF; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Martinez L; Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Alarid-Escudero F; Drug Policy Program, Center for Research and Teaching in Economics, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
  • Salomon JA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Studdert DM; Stanford Law School and Stanford Health Policy and the Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Andrews JR; Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Center for Health Policy and the Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(Suppl 2): S138-S145, 2021 07 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1373634
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although much of the public health effort to combat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has focused on disease control strategies in public settings, transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within households remains an important problem. The nature and determinants of household transmission are poorly understood.

METHODS:

To address this gap, we gathered and analyzed data from 22 published and prepublished studies from 10 countries (20 291 household contacts) that were available through 2 September 2020. Our goal was to combine estimates of the SARS-CoV-2 household secondary attack rate (SAR) and to explore variation in estimates of the household SAR.

RESULTS:

The overall pooled random-effects estimate of the household SAR was 17.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7-21.2%). In study-level, random-effects meta-regressions stratified by testing frequency (1 test, 2 tests, >2 tests), SAR estimates were 9.2% (95% CI, 6.7-12.3%), 17.5% (95% CI, 13.9-21.8%), and 21.3% (95% CI, 13.8-31.3%), respectively. Household SARs tended to be higher among older adult contacts and among contacts of symptomatic cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings suggest that SARs reported using a single follow-up test may be underestimated, and that testing household contacts of COVID-19 cases on multiple occasions may increase the yield for identifying secondary cases.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cid

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cid