Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.
Chudleigh, Jane; Holder, Pru; Moody, Louise; Simpson, Alan; Southern, Kevin; Morris, Stephen; Fusco, Francesco; Ulph, Fiona; Bryon, Mandy; Bonham, James R; Olander, Ellinor.
  • Chudleigh J; School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK j.chudleigh@city.ac.uk.
  • Holder P; School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
  • Moody L; Centre for Arts, Memory and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.
  • Simpson A; Health Services and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Southern K; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College, London, UK.
  • Morris S; Paediatrics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.
  • Fusco F; Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ulph F; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Bryon M; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Bonham JR; Paediatric Psychology and Play Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Olander E; Pharmacy, Diagnostics and Genetics, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(8): e050773, 2021 08 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1376508
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice.

DESIGN:

A process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory.

SETTING:

Three National Health Service provider organisations in England.

PARTICIPANTS:

Twenty-four healthcare professionals (7 newborn screening laboratory staff and 24 clinicians) and 18 parents were interviewed.

INTERVENTIONS:

Three co-designed interventions were implemented in practice standardised laboratory proformas, communication checklists and an email/letter template. PRIMARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Acceptability and feasibility of the co-designed interventions.

RESULTS:

Auditing the implementation of these interventions revealed between 58%-76% of the items on the laboratory proforma and 43%-80% of items on the communication checklists were completed. Interviews with healthcare professionals who had used the interventions in practice provided positive feedback in relation to the purpose of the interventions and the ease of completion both of which were viewed as enhancing communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Interviews with parents highlighted the perceived benefit of the co-designed interventions in terms of consistency, pacing and tailoring of information as well as providing reliable information to families following communication of the positive newborn bloodspot screening result. The process evaluation illuminated organisational and contextual barriers during implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice.

CONCLUSION:

Variations in communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results continue to exist. The co-designed interventions could help to standardise communication of positive newborn screening results from laboratories to clinicians and from clinicians to parents which in turn could improve parents' experience of receiving a positive newborn bloodspot screening result. Implementation highlighted some organisational and contextual barriers to effective adoption of the co-designed interventions in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN15330120.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: State Medicine / Neonatal Screening Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans / Infant, Newborn Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-050773

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: State Medicine / Neonatal Screening Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans / Infant, Newborn Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-050773