Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation.
Sharma, Dhruv; Campiti, Vincent J; Ye, Michael J; Saltagi, Mohamad; Carroll, Aaron E; Ting, Jonathan Y; Illing, Elisa A; Park, Jae Hong; Nelson, Rick F; Burgin, Sarah J.
  • Sharma D; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Campiti VJ; School of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Ye MJ; School of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Saltagi M; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Carroll AE; School of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Ting JY; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Illing EA; School of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Park JH; School of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Nelson RF; Department of Pediatrics Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
  • Burgin SJ; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 6(1): 129-136, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1384249
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to healthcare workers through airborne aerosolization during otologic surgery has not been characterized. The objective of this study was to describe and quantify the aerosol generation during common otologic procedures in both cadaveric surgical simulation and live patient surgery.

METHODS:

The number concentrations of generated aerosols in the particle size range of 0.30 to 10.0 µm were quantified using an optical particle sizer during both a cadaveric simulation of routine otologic procedures as well as cochlear implant surgery on live patients in the operating room.

RESULTS:

In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest using cold techniques (without electrocautery) (n = 4) did not generate aerosols above baseline concentrations. Tympanoplasty (n = 3) and mastoidectomy (n = 3) both produced statistically significant increases in concentrations of aerosols (P < 0.05), predominantly submicron particles (< 1.0 µm). High-speed, powered drilling of the temporal bone during mastoidectomy with a Multi Flute cutting burr resulted in higher peak concentrations and greater number of spikes in aerosols than with a diamond burr. In the operating room, spikes in aerosols occurred during both cochlear implant surgeries.

CONCLUSION:

In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest without electrocautery did not generate aerosol levels above baseline, while significant aerosol levels were generated during mastoidectomy and to a much less degree during tympanoplasty. Aerosol spikes were appreciated during cochlear implantation surgery in live patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article