Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review.
Veronese, Nicola; Petrovic, Mirko; Benetos, Athanase; Denkinger, Michael; Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn; Knol, Wilma; Marking, Christine; Soulis, George; Maggi, Stefania; Cherubini, Antonio.
  • Veronese N; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. Electronic address: nicola.veronese@unipa.it.
  • Petrovic M; Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Benetos A; Department of Geriatrics and FHU CARTAGE-PROFILES, CHRU de Nancy and INSERM 1116, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
  • Denkinger M; Institute for Geriatric Research at Agaplesion Bethesda Hospital Ulm, Ulm University and Geriatric Centre, Ulm, Germany.
  • Gudmundsson A; Landspitali University Hospital, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Knol W; Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Marking C; Memory Disorder Research Group, Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
  • Soulis G; Outpatient Geriatric Assessment Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece.
  • Maggi S; CNR-IN Aging Branch, Padua, Italy.
  • Cherubini A; Geriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Ageing Res Rev ; 71: 101455, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1385018
ABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic older subjects have been disproportionately affected by the disease. Vaccination is a fundamental intervention to prevent the negative consequences of COVID-19, but it is not known if the needs and vulnerabilities of older people are adequately addressed by their inclusion in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of vaccines for COVID-19. Given this background, we aimed to evaluate if current and ongoing phase II-III RCTs evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines included a representative sample of older people. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed until May 01st, 2021. Among 474 abstracts initially retrieved, 20 RCTs (ten already published, ten ongoing) were included. In the ten studies already published, the mean age of participants was 45.2 ± 11.9 years and only 9.83% of the participants were more than 65 years, 1.66% more than 75 years and less than 1% (0.55%) more than 85 years. In the ten ongoing RCTs, many of the studies aimed at including participants older than 18 years, with one study including participants between 18 and 84 years, and two between 21 and 100 years. In conclusion, our systematic review demonstrates that in published and ongoing phase II-III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines only a tiny fraction of the most vulnerable group of older people was included, although they clearly were the first population that had to be vaccinated.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: Ageing Res Rev Journal subject: Geriatrics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: Ageing Res Rev Journal subject: Geriatrics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article