Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A modeling study to inform screening and testing interventions for the control of SARS-CoV-2 on university campuses.
Lopman, Ben; Liu, Carol Y; Le Guillou, Adrien; Handel, Andreas; Lash, Timothy L; Isakov, Alexander P; Jenness, Samuel M.
  • Lopman B; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Liu CY; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. carol.liu@emory.edu.
  • Le Guillou A; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Handel A; Department of Research and Public Health, Reims Teaching Hospitals, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims, France.
  • Lash TL; College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
  • Isakov AP; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Jenness SM; School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 5900, 2021 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1387467
ABSTRACT
University administrators face decisions about how to safely return and maintain students, staff and faculty on campus throughout the 2020-21 school year. We developed a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) deterministic compartmental transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 among university students, staff, and faculty. Our goals were to inform planning at our own university, Emory University, a medium-sized university with around 15,000 students and 15,000 faculty and staff, and to provide a flexible modeling framework to inform the planning efforts at similar academic institutions. Control strategies of isolation and quarantine are initiated by screening (regardless of symptoms) or testing (of symptomatic individuals). We explored a range of screening and testing frequencies and performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. We found that among students, monthly and weekly screening can reduce cumulative incidence by 59% and 87%, respectively, while testing with a 2-, 4- and 7-day delay between onset of infectiousness and testing results in an 84%, 74% and 55% reduction in cumulative incidence. Smaller reductions were observed among staff and faculty. Community-introduction of SARS-CoV-2 onto campus may be controlled with testing, isolation, contract tracing and quarantine. Screening would need to be performed at least weekly to have substantial reductions beyond disease surveillance. This model can also inform resource requirements of diagnostic capacity and isolation/quarantine facilities associated with different strategies.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Universities / Quarantine / Mass Screening / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-85252-Z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Universities / Quarantine / Mass Screening / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-85252-Z