Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Feasibility of an online platform delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic respiratory disease.
Lewis, Adam; Knight, Ellena; Bland, Matthew; Middleton, Jack; Mitchell, Esther; McCrum, Kate; Conway, Joy; Bevan-Smith, Elaine.
  • Lewis A; Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK Adam.Lewis@brunel.ac.uk.
  • Knight E; Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Brockworth, UK.
  • Bland M; Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Brockworth, UK.
  • Middleton J; Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
  • Mitchell E; Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Brockworth, UK.
  • McCrum K; University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Conway J; Centre for Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
  • Bevan-Smith E; Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Brockworth, UK.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 8(1)2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1388518
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

SARS-CoV-2 has restricted access to face-to-face delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Evidence suggests that telehealth-PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR. However, it is unknown whether patients who have been referred to face-to-face programmes can feasibly complete an online-PR programme.

METHODS:

This service evaluation used a mixed-methods approach to investigate a rapid PR service remodelling using the University of Gloucestershire eLearn Moodle platform. Quantitative baseline demographic and PR outcome data were collected from online-PR participants, and semistructured interviews were completed with PR staff and participants.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five individuals were eligible from a PR waiting list. Thirteen declined participation and 14 completed PR. Significant pre-post online PR improvements were achieved in 1 min sit-to-stand (CI 2.1 to 9 (p=0.004)), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (CI -0.3 to -2.6 (p=0.023)), Primary Health Questionnaire-9 (CI -0.3 to -5.1 (p=0.029)), Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnoea (CI 0.5 to 1.3 (p=0.001)), fatigue (CI 0.7 to 2 (p=0.0004)), emotion (CI 0.7 to 1.7 (p=0.0002)), mastery (CI 0.4 to 1.3 (p=0.001)). Interviews indicated that patient PR inclusion was made possible with digital support and a PR introduction session improved participant engagement and safety. Incremental progression of exercise was perceived as more successful online compared with face-to-face PR. However, perceptions were that education sessions were less successful. Online-PR required significant staff time resource.

DISCUSSION:

Online-PR improves patient outcomes and is feasible and acceptable for individuals referred for face-to-face PR in the context of a requirement for social distancing. Face-to-face programmes can be adapted in a rapid fashion with both staff and participants perceiving benefit. Future pragmatic trials are now warranted comparing online-PR including remote assessments to centre-based PR with suitably matched outcomes, and patient and staff perceptions sought regarding barriers and facilitators of online delivery.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical Therapy Modalities / Internet / Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / Telerehabilitation Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: BMJRESP-2021-000880

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical Therapy Modalities / Internet / Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / Telerehabilitation Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: BMJRESP-2021-000880