Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Soni, Nilam J; Boyd, Jeremy S; Mints, Gregory; Proud, Kevin C; Jensen, Trevor P; Liu, Gigi; Mathews, Benji K; Schott, Christopher K; Kurian, Linda; LoPresti, Charles M; Andrus, Phil; Nathanson, Robert; Smith, Natalie; Haro, Elizabeth K; Mader, Michael J; Pugh, Jacqueline; Restrepo, Marcos I; Lucas, Brian P.
  • Soni NJ; South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA. sonin@uthscsa.edu.
  • Boyd JS; Department of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. sonin@uthscsa.edu.
  • Mints G; University of Texas Health San Antonio, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7982, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. sonin@uthscsa.edu.
  • Proud KC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Veterans Affairs - Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Jensen TP; Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Liu G; Division of Hospital Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Mathews BK; South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Schott CK; Department of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Kurian L; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • LoPresti CM; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Andrus P; Department of Hospital Medicine, Regions Hospital, HealthPartners, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  • Nathanson R; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Veterans Affairs of Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Smith N; Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Haro EK; Division of Hospital Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
  • Mader MJ; Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Pugh J; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Restrepo MI; Department of Emergency Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
  • Lucas BP; South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Ultrasound J ; 13(1): 39, 2021 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1394444
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lack of training is currently the most common barrier to implementation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use in clinical practice, and in-person POCUS continuing medical education (CME) courses have been paramount in improving this training gap. Due to travel restrictions and physical distancing requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic, most in-person POCUS training courses were cancelled. Though tele-ultrasound technology has existed for several years, use of tele-ultrasound technology to deliver hands-on training during a POCUS CME course has not been previously described.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing educational outcomes, course evaluations, and learner and faculty feedback from in-person versus tele-ultrasound POCUS courses. The same POCUS educational curriculum was delivered to learners by the two course formats. Data from the most recent pre-pandemic in-person course were compared to tele-ultrasound courses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS:

Pre- and post-course knowledge test scores of learners from the in-person (n = 88) and tele-ultrasound course (n = 52) were compared. Though mean pre-course knowledge test scores were higher among learners of the tele-ultrasound versus in-person course (78% vs. 71%; p = 0.001), there was no significant difference in the post-course test scores between learners of the two course formats (89% vs. 87%; p = 0.069). Both learners and faculty rated the tele-ultrasound course highly (4.6-5.0 on a 5-point scale) for effectiveness of virtual lectures, tele-ultrasound hands-on scanning sessions, and course administration. Faculty generally expressed less satisfaction with their ability to engage with learners, troubleshoot image acquisition, and provide feedback during the tele-ultrasound course but felt learners completed the tele-ultrasound course with a better basic POCUS skillset.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to a traditional in-person course, tele-ultrasound POCUS CME courses appeared to be as effective for improving POCUS knowledge post-course and fulfilling learning objectives. Our findings can serve as a roadmap for educators seeking guidance on development of a tele-ultrasound POCUS training course whose demand will likely persist beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Language: English Journal: Ultrasound J Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13089-021-00242-6

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Language: English Journal: Ultrasound J Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13089-021-00242-6