Your browser doesn't support javascript.
What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers' experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Billings, Jo; Abou Seif, Nada; Hegarty, Siobhan; Ondruskova, Tamara; Soulios, Emilia; Bloomfield, Michael; Greene, Talya.
  • Billings J; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Abou Seif N; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hegarty S; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ondruskova T; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Soulios E; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bloomfield M; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Greene T; Traumatic Stress Clinic, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0256454, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1394544
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a significant burden on the mental health and wellbeing of frontline health and social care workers. The need to support frontline staff has been recognised. However, there is to date little research specifically on how best to support the mental health needs of frontline workers, and none on their own experiences and views about what might be most helpful.

AIMS:

We set out to redress this research gap by qualitatively exploring UK frontline health and social care workers' own experiences and views of psychosocial support during the pandemic.

METHOD:

Frontline health and social care workers were recruited purposively through social media and by snowball sampling via healthcare colleagues. Workers who volunteered to take part in the study were interviewed remotely following a semi-structured interview guide. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed by the research team following the principles of Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

RESULTS:

We conducted 25 interviews with frontline workers from a variety of professional groups working in health and social care settings across the UK. Themes derived from our analysis showed that workers' experiences and views about psychosocial support were complex. Peer support was many workers' first line of support but could also be experienced as a burden. Workers were ambivalent about support shown by organisations, media and the public. Whilst workers valued psychological support services, there were many disparities in provision and barriers to access.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study show that frontline health and social care workers are likely to need a flexible system of support including peer, organisational and professional support. More research is needed to fully unpack the structural, systemic and individual barriers to accessing psychosocial support. Greater collaboration, consultation and co-production of support services and their evaluation is warranted.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Qualitative Research / Social Workers / Psychosocial Support Systems / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0256454

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Qualitative Research / Social Workers / Psychosocial Support Systems / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0256454