Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The perceived risk of being infected at work: An application of the job demands-resources model to workplace safety during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Falco, Alessandra; Girardi, Damiano; Dal Corso, Laura; Yildirim, Murat; Converso, Daniela.
  • Falco A; Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, Section of Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Girardi D; Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, Section of Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Dal Corso L; Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, Section of Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Yildirim M; Department of Psychology, Agri Ibrahim Çeçen University, Agri, Turkey.
  • Converso D; Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0257197, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1403318
ABSTRACT
Safety at work, both physical and psychological, plays a central role for workers and organizations during the ongoing outbreak of COVID-19. Building on the job demands-resources (JD-R) model applied to safety at work, in this study we proposed that the perceived risk of being infected with COVID-19 at work can be conceptualized as a job demand (i.e., a risk factor for work-related stress), whereas those characteristics of the job (physical and psychosocial) that help workers to reduce or manage this risk can be conceived as job resources (i.e., protective factors). We hypothesized that the perceived risk of being infected at work is positively associated with emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, we hypothesized that job resources, in terms of safety systems, communication, decision-making, situational awareness, fatigue management, and participation in decision-making, are negatively associated with emotional exhaustion. We also hypothesized that job resources buffer the association between perceived risk and emotional exhaustion. Overall, 358 workers (meanage = 36.3±12.2 years) completed a self-report questionnaire, and the hypothesized relationships were tested using moderated multiple regression. Results largely supported our predictions. The perceived risk of being infected at work was positively associated with emotional exhaustion, whereas all the job resources were negatively associated with it. Furthermore, safety systems, communication, decision-making, and participation in decision-making buffered the relationship between the perceived risk of being infected at work and emotional exhaustion. In a perspective of prevention and health promotion, this study suggested that organizations should reduce the potential risk of being infected at work, whenever possible. At same time, those characteristics of the job that can help workers to reduce or manage the risk of infection should be strengthened.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Workplace / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0257197

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Workplace / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0257197