Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Healthcare Resource Use in Patients with Immune-Mediated Conditions Treated with Targeted Immunomodulators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Claims Analysis.
Bergman, Martin; Saffore, Christopher D; Kim, Katherine J; Patel, Pankaj A; Garg, Vishvas; Xuan, Si; Naik, Haley B.
  • Bergman M; Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Saffore CD; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA. Christopher.Saffore@abbvie.com.
  • Kim KJ; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Patel PA; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Garg V; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Xuan S; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Naik HB; Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Adv Ther ; 38(10): 5302-5316, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1404675
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine medical care may result in altered healthcare resource use in patients with immune-mediated conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of treatment interruptions in patients with and without COVID-19 infections who were treated with targeted immunomodulators (TIMs) in the USA.

METHODS:

Data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases were analyzed in patients with immune-mediated conditions from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2020. Healthcare resource use (HCRU) including hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, in-person outpatient visits, and respiratory outcomes was assessed in a cohort of patients without COVID-19 who had uninterrupted versus interrupted TIM use. The impact of treatment interruption on HCRU and respiratory outcomes was also evaluated in a cohort of patients with COVID-19. Results from adjusted logistic regression were reported as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS:

Approximately 25% of patients in both the COVID-19 (N = 787) and non-COVID-19 cohorts (N = 77,178) experienced interruptions in TIM therapy. In the non-COVID-19 cohort, the likelihood of being hospitalized was 20% less in patients with uninterrupted versus interrupted TIM use (aOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.90). Patients with uninterrupted TIM use had a similar likelihood of an ED visit (aOR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.08) and respiratory outcome (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.31) versus patients with interrupted TIM use. The likelihood of having an in-person outpatient visit was 87% greater in patients with uninterrupted versus interrupted TIM use (aOR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.81-1.94). Similar findings were observed in the COVID-19 cohort.

CONCLUSION:

This analysis of real-world claims data showed that uninterrupted TIM use was not associated with an increased likelihood of hospitalizations, ED visits, or negative respiratory outcomes compared to interrupted TIM use among patients with immune-mediated conditions, regardless of COVID-19 diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Adv Ther Journal subject: Therapeutics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12325-021-01906-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Adv Ther Journal subject: Therapeutics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12325-021-01906-4