The fairness of ventilator allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bioethics
; 36(6): 715-723, 2022 07.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1416286
ABSTRACT
There is ongoing debate on how to fairly allocate scarce critical care resources to patients with COVID-19. The debate revolves around two views those who believe that priority for scarce resources should primarily aim at saving the most lives (SML) or at saving the most life-years, and those who believe that public health should focus on health equity to address health disparities and social determinants of health. I argue that maximizing medical outcomes by saving the greatest number of patients is not a plausible strategy for combating COVID-19. There are reasons of fairness to give each patient who can meet general eligibility requirements a chance of being saved. Rather than focusing on outcome maximization, a better solution would be the individualist lottery that takes account of probability of survival and duration of treatment. Although the individualist lottery allocates scarce resources in a fair way that is responsive to health equity concerns, it still gives considerable weight to the concern of SML. Thus, this procedure can be reasonably accepted by all key stakeholders.
Keywords
Full text:
Available
Collection:
International databases
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
COVID-19
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Limits:
Humans
Language:
English
Journal:
Bioethics
Journal subject:
Ethics
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Bioe.12955
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS