Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Scoping future outbreaks: a scoping review on the outbreak prediction of the WHO Blueprint list of priority diseases.
Jonkmans, Nils; D'Acremont, Valérie; Flahault, Antoine.
  • Jonkmans N; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland nils.jonkmans@unil.ch.
  • D'Acremont V; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Flahault A; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
BMJ Glob Health ; 6(9)2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1416662
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The WHO's Research and Development Blueprint priority list designates emerging diseases with the potential to generate public health emergencies for which insufficient preventive solutions exist. The list aims to reduce the time to the availability of resources that can avert public health crises. The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic illustrates that an effective method of mitigating such crises is the pre-emptive prediction of outbreaks. This scoping review thus aimed to map and identify the evidence available to predict future outbreaks of the Blueprint diseases.

METHODS:

We conducted a scoping review of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science related to the evidence predicting future outbreaks of Ebola and Marburg virus, Zika virus, Lassa fever, Nipah and Henipaviral disease, Rift Valley fever, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever, Severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome and Disease X. Prediction methods, outbreak features predicted and implementation of predictions were evaluated. We conducted a narrative and quantitative evidence synthesis to highlight prediction methods that could be further investigated for the prevention of Blueprint diseases and COVID-19 outbreaks.

RESULTS:

Out of 3959 articles identified, we included 58 articles based on inclusion criteria. 5 major prediction methods emerged; the most frequent being spatio-temporal risk maps predicting outbreak risk periods and locations through vector and climate data. Stochastic models were predominant. Rift Valley fever was the most predicted disease. Diseases with complex sociocultural factors such as Ebola were often predicted through multifactorial risk-based estimations. 10% of models were implemented by health authorities. No article predicted Disease X outbreaks.

CONCLUSIONS:

Spatiotemporal models for diseases with strong climatic and vectorial components, as in River Valley fever prediction, may currently best reduce the time to the availability of resources. A wide literature gap exists in the prediction of zoonoses with complex sociocultural and ecological dynamics such as Ebola, COVID-19 and especially Disease X.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola / Zika Virus / Zika Virus Infection / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2021-006623

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola / Zika Virus / Zika Virus Infection / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2021-006623