Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Isothermal amplification and fluorescent detection of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 variant virus in nasopharyngeal swabs.
Jones, Les; Bakre, Abhijeet; Naikare, Hemant; Kolhe, Ravindra; Sanchez, Susan; Mosley, Yung-Yi C; Tripp, Ralph A.
  • Jones L; Department of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Bakre A; State of Georgia COVID-19 Taskforce, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Naikare H; Department of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Kolhe R; State of Georgia COVID-19 Taskforce, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Sanchez S; Department of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Mosley YC; Tifton Diagnostic and Investigational Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Tripp RA; State of Georgia COVID-19 Taskforce, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0257563, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1416905
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 is a serious health threat causing worldwide morbidity and mortality. Real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is currently the standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Although various nucleic acid-based assays have been developed to aid the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from COVID-19 patient samples, the objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic test that can be completed in 30 minutes without having to isolate RNA from the samples. Here, we present an RNA amplification detection method performed using reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) reactions to achieve specific, rapid (30 min), and sensitive (<100 copies) fluorescent detection in real-time of SARS-CoV-2 directly from patient nasopharyngeal swab (NP) samples. When compared to RT-qPCR, positive NP swab samples assayed by fluorescent RT-LAMP had 98% (n = 41/42) concordance and negative NP swab samples assayed by fluorescent RT-LAMP had 87% (n = 59/68) concordance for the same samples. Importantly, the fluorescent RT-LAMP results were obtained without purification of RNA from the NP swab samples in contrast to RT-qPCR. We also show that the fluorescent RT-LAMP assay can specifically detect live virus directly from cultures of both SARS-CoV-2 wild type (WA1/2020), and a SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 (alpha) variant strain with equal sensitivity to RT-qPCR. RT-LAMP has several advantages over RT-qPCR including isothermal amplification, speed (<30 min), reduced costs, and similar sensitivity and specificity.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0257563

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0257563