Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Using Low-Cost Sensors to Assess Fine Particulate Matter Infiltration (PM2.5) during a Wildfire Smoke Episode at a Large Inpatient Healthcare Facility.
Nguyen, Phuong D M; Martinussen, Nika; Mallach, Gary; Ebrahimi, Ghazal; Jones, Kori; Zimmerman, Naomi; Henderson, Sarah B.
  • Nguyen PDM; Environmental Health Services, BC Center for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada.
  • Martinussen N; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Mallach G; Air Health Sciences Division, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada.
  • Ebrahimi G; Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC V6H 4C1, Canada.
  • Jones K; Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1A1, Canada.
  • Zimmerman N; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Henderson SB; Environmental Health Services, BC Center for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(18)2021 09 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1430860
ABSTRACT
Wildfire smoke exposure is associated with a range of acute health outcomes, which can be more severe in individuals with underlying health conditions. Currently, there is limited information on the susceptibility of healthcare facilities to smoke infiltration. As part of a larger study to address this gap, a rehabilitation facility in Vancouver, Canada was outfitted with one outdoor and seven indoor low-cost fine particulate matter (PM2.5) sensors in Air Quality Eggs (EGG) during the summer of 2020. Raw measurements were calibrated using temperature, relative humidity, and dew point derived from the EGG data. The infiltration coefficient was quantified using a distributed lag model. Indoor concentrations during the smoke episode were elevated throughout the building, though non-uniformly. After censoring indoor-only peaks, the average infiltration coefficient (range) during typical days was 0.32 (0.22-0.39), compared with 0.37 (0.31-0.47) during the smoke episode, a 19% increase on average. Indoor PM2.5 concentrations quickly reflected outdoor conditions during and after the smoke episode. It is unclear whether these results will be generalizable to other years due to COVID-related changes to building operations, but some of the safety protocols may offer valuable lessons for future wildfire seasons. For example, points of building entry and exit were reduced from eight to two during the pandemic, which likely helped to protect the building from wildfire smoke infiltration. Overall, these results demonstrate the utility of indoor low-cost sensors in understanding the impacts of extreme smoke events on facilities where highly susceptible individuals are present. Furthermore, they highlight the need to employ interventions that enhance indoor air quality in such facilities during smoke events.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Air Pollution, Indoor / Wildfires / Air Pollutants / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph18189811

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Air Pollution, Indoor / Wildfires / Air Pollutants / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph18189811