Lupus Anticoagulant Single Positivity During the Acute Phase of COVID-19 Is Not Associated With Venous Thromboembolism or In-Hospital Mortality.
Arthritis Rheumatol
; 73(11): 1976-1985, 2021 11.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1432359
Semantic information from SemMedBD (by NLM)
1. Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor NEG_ASSOCIATED_WITH Venous Thromboembolism
2. Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor ASSOCIATED_WITH COVID-19
3. COVID-19 PROCESS_OF Patients
4. Patients LOCATION_OF Antiphospholipid Antibodies
5. High Level PROCESS_OF Patients
6. vinyltriethoxysilane NEG_COEXISTS_WITH Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor
7. Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor NEG_ASSOCIATED_WITH Venous Thromboembolism
8. Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor ASSOCIATED_WITH COVID-19
9. COVID-19 PROCESS_OF Patients
10. Patients LOCATION_OF Antiphospholipid Antibodies
11. High Level PROCESS_OF Patients
12. vinyltriethoxysilane NEG_COEXISTS_WITH Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in COVID-19 is controversial. This study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of conventional and nonconventional aPLs in patients with COVID-19.METHODS:
This was a multicenter, prospective observational study in a French cohort of patients hospitalized with suspected COVID-19.RESULTS:
Two hundred forty-nine patients were hospitalized with suspected COVID-19, in whom COVID-19 was confirmed in 154 and not confirmed in 95. We found a significant increase in lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity among patients with COVID-19 compared to patients without COVID-19 (60.9% versus 23.7%; P < 0.001), while prevalence of conventional aPLs (IgG and IgM anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I and IgG and IgM anticardiolipin isotypes) and nonconventional aPLs (IgA isotype of anticardiolipin, IgA isotype of anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I, IgG and IgM isotypes of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, and IgG and IgM isotypes of antiprothrombin) was low in both groups. Patients with COVID-19 who were positive for LAC, as compared to patients with COVID-19 who were negative for LAC, had higher levels of fibrinogen (median 6.0 gm/liter [interquartile range 5.0-7.0] versus 5.3 gm/liter [interquartile range 4.3-6.4]; P = 0.028) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (median 115.5 mg/liter [interquartile range 66.0-204.8] versus 91.8 mg/liter [interquartile range 27.0-155.1]; P = 0.019). Univariate analysis did not show any association between LAC positivity and higher risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (odds ratio 1.02 [95% confidence interval 0.44-2.43], P = 0.95) or in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.80 [95% confidence interval 0.70-5.05], P = 0.24). With and without adjustment for CRP level, age, and sex, Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to LAC positivity confirmed the absence of an association with VTE or in-hospital mortality (unadjusted P = 0.64 and P = 0.26, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 [95% confidence interval 0.48-2.60] and 1.80 [95% confidence interval 0.67-5.01], respectively).CONCLUSION:
Patients with COVID-19 have an increased prevalence of LAC positivity associated with biologic markers of inflammation. However, LAC positivity at the time of hospital admission is not associated with VTE risk and/or in-hospital mortality.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
International databases
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor
/
Venous Thromboembolism
/
COVID-19
Type of study:
Controlled clinical trial
/
Etiology study
/
Observational study
/
Prognostic study
/
Randomized controlled trials
/
Risk factors
Topics:
Long Covid
Limits:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Language:
English
Journal:
Arthritis Rheumatol
Year:
2021
Document Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Art.41777
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS