Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Clinical evaluation of the molecular-based BD SARS-CoV-2/Flu for the BD MAX™ system.
Paradis, Sonia; Lockamy, Elizabeth; Cooper, Charles K; Young, Stephen.
  • Paradis S; Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences - Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, 7 Loveton Circle, Sparks, MD 21152, USA.
  • Lockamy E; Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences - Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, 7 Loveton Circle, Sparks, MD 21152, USA.
  • Cooper CK; Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences - Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, 7 Loveton Circle, Sparks, MD 21152, USA. Electronic address: Charles_K_Cooper@bd.com.
  • Young S; Tricore Reference Laboratory, 1001 Woodward Place, N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA. Electronic address: Steve.Young@Tricore.org.
J Clin Virol ; 143: 104946, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1433478
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

COVID-19 and influenza (flu) share similar clinical symptoms. Therefore, differential detection of these viruses during the respiratory virus season will be an important component for proper patient triage, management, and treatment.

OBJECTIVES:

Establish the diagnostic performance related to SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B detection for the BD SARS-CoV-2/Flu for BD MAX™ System ("MAX SARS-CoV-2/Flu") multiplex assay. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Two hundred and thirty-five (235) retrospective nasopharyngeal specimens were obtained from external vendors. The BD BioGx SARS-CoV-2 Reagents for BD MAX™ System ("BioGx SARS-CoV-2″) and the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV ("Xpert Flu/RSV") were utilized as reference methods.

RESULTS:

By reference methods, 52 specimens were SARS-CoV-2-positive, 59 were Flu A-positive, and 60 were Flu B-positive. MAX SARS-CoV-2/Flu had positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) values for SARS-CoV-2 detection of 96.2% ([95%CI]87.0-98.9) and 100% [95%CI88.7-100], respectively; PPA values for Flu A and Flu B of 100% [95%CI93.9-100] and 98.3% [95%CI91.1-99.7], respectively, and NPA values for Flu A and Flu B of 98.9% [95%CI94.0-99.8] and 100% [95%CI95.9-100], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The MAX SARS-CoV-2/Flu assay met FDA-EUA performance criteria for SARS-CoV-2 (≥95% for PPA and NPA) and FDA clearance criteria for Flu A/B (PPA ≥90%; lower bound of the 95%CI ≥80% and NPA ≥95%; lower bound of the 95%CI ≥90%).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jcv.2021.104946

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jcv.2021.104946