Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Syndromic approach to SARS-CoV-2 detection using QIAstat-Dx SARS-CoV-2 panel from clinical samples.
Gupta, Akshita; Soni, Anushika; Rooge, Sheetalnath; Paul, Diptanu; Agarwal, Reshu; Tarai, Bansidhar; Gupta, Ekta.
  • Gupta A; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: akshitagupta1412@gmail.com.
  • Soni A; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: dranushkasoni@yahoo.co.in.
  • Rooge S; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: sheetalnath.rooge@gmail.com.
  • Paul D; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: drdiptanumicro@gmail.com.
  • Agarwal R; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: agarwalreshu286@gmail.com.
  • Tarai B; Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: bansidhar.tarai@maxhealthcare.com.
  • Gupta E; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: ekta.gaurisha@gmail.com.
J Virol Methods ; 298: 114300, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1433624
ABSTRACT
The QIAstat-Dx SARS-CoV-2 panel is a multiplex cartridge based assay based on real time PCR which can detect 17 respiratory viruses, including the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. A syndromic approach is the need of the hour for COVID-19 diagnostics among patients presenting with respiratory symptoms. The present study was done to evaluate 120 archived respiratory clinical specimens for SARS-CoV-2 on the SARS-CoV-2 panel. Further, 27 specimens were tested for other respiratory viruses, in comparison with the BioFire RP1.7 platform. The sensitivity and specificity for SARS-CoV-2 on SARS panel was found to be 90.00 % and 100 % respectively, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. The positive predictive value was found to be 100 %, negative predictive value was found to be 99.93 % and accuracy was 99.93 %. Detection of other respiratory viruses observed a concordance of 77.7 %. Despite advantages of speed, minimal expertise and accurate results; significant costs and discrepancies at Ct >35 remain important limitations of the SARS panel.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Viruses / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Virol Methods Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Viruses / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Virol Methods Year: 2021 Document Type: Article