Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Psychological factors shaping public responses to COVID-19 digital contact tracing technologies in Germany.
Kozyreva, Anastasia; Lorenz-Spreen, Philipp; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Garrett, Paul M; Herzog, Stefan M; Pachur, Thorsten; Hertwig, Ralph.
  • Kozyreva A; Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. kozyreva@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.
  • Lorenz-Spreen P; Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
  • Lewandowsky S; School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Garrett PM; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Herzog SM; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Pachur T; Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
  • Hertwig R; Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 18716, 2021 09 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1434152
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has seen one of the first large-scale uses of digital contact tracing to track a chain of infection and contain the spread of a virus. The new technology has posed challenges both for governments aiming at high and effective uptake and for citizens weighing its benefits (e.g., protecting others' health) against the potential risks (e.g., loss of data privacy). Our cross-sectional survey with repeated measures across four samples in Germany ([Formula see text]) focused on psychological factors contributing to the public adoption of digital contact tracing. We found that public acceptance of privacy-encroaching measures (e.g., granting the government emergency access to people's medical records or location tracking data) decreased over the course of the pandemic. Intentions to use contact tracing apps-hypothetical ones or the Corona-Warn-App launched in Germany in June 2020-were high. Users and non-users of the Corona-Warn-App differed in their assessment of its risks and benefits, in their knowledge of the underlying technology, and in their reasons to download or not to download the app. Trust in the app's perceived security and belief in its effectiveness emerged as psychological factors playing a key role in its adoption. We incorporate our findings into a behavioral framework for digital contact tracing and provide policy recommendations.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Perception / Contact Tracing / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-98249-5

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Perception / Contact Tracing / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-98249-5