Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Supporting Primary Care Professionals to Stay in Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Views on Personal Risk and Access to Testing During the First Wave of Pandemic in Europe.
Wanat, Marta; Hoste, Melanie; Gobat, Nina; Anastasaki, Marilena; Böhmer, Femke; Chlabicz, Slawomir; Colliers, Annelies; Farrell, Karen; Karkana, Maria-Nefeli; Kinsman, John; Lionis, Christos; Marcinowicz, Ludmila; Reinhardt, Katrin; Skoglund, Ingmarie; Sundvall, Pär-Daniel; Vellinga, Akke; Goossens, Herman; Butler, Christopher C; van der Velden, Alike; Anthierens, Sibyl; Tonkin-Crine, Sarah.
  • Wanat M; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Hoste M; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Gobat N; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Anastasaki M; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Böhmer F; Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.
  • Chlabicz S; Institute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
  • Colliers A; Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Farrell K; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Karkana MN; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Kinsman J; Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.
  • Lionis C; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Solna, Sweden.
  • Marcinowicz L; Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.
  • Reinhardt K; Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Maternity Care, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Skoglund I; Institute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
  • Sundvall PD; General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Vellinga A; Research, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Goossens H; General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Butler CC; Research, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • van der Velden A; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Anthierens S; Health Research Board (HRB) Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, Galway, Ireland.
  • Tonkin-Crine S; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 726319, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1441118
ABSTRACT

Background:

Minimising primary care professionals' (PCPs) risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial to ensure their safety as well as functioning health care system. PCPs' perspectives on the support they needed in the early stages of a public health crisis can inform future preparedness.

Aim:

To understand PCPs' experiences of providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with focus on personal risk from COVID-19 and testing. Design and

Setting:

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with PCPs in England, Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Greece and Sweden, between April and July 2020.

Method:

Interviews were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis techniques.

Results:

Eighty interviews were conducted, showing that PCPs tried to make sense of their risk of both contracting and severity of COVID-19 by assessing individual risk factors and perceived effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). They had limited access to PPE yet continued providing care as their "duty." Some PCPs felt that they were put in high-risk situations when patients or colleagues were not flagging symptoms of COVID-19. Not having access to testing in the initial stages of the pandemic was somewhat accepted but when available, was valued.

Conclusion:

Access to adequate PPE and testing, as well as training for staff and education for patients about the importance of ensuring staff safety is crucial. Given PCPs' varied response in how they appraised personal risk and their tolerance for working, PCPs may benefit from the autonomy in deciding how they want to work during health emergencies.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2021.726319

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2021.726319