Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership.
Cadel, Lauren; Marcinow, Michelle; Sandercock, Jane; Dowedoff, Penny; Guilcher, Sara J T; Maybee, Alies; Law, Susan; Kuluski, Kerry.
  • Cadel L; Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Marcinow M; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Sandercock J; Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Dowedoff P; Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Guilcher SJT; Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Maybee A; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Law S; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kuluski K; Patient Partner, Canada.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0257880, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1443848
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic?

OBJECTIVE:

To examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic.

METHODS:

The following databases were searched Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted.

RESULTS:

Twenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Evidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Participation / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0257880

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Participation / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0257880