Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Virtual Reality as a Pain Management Modality in Academic, Community, and Safety-Net Settings: Qualitative Analysis.
Sarkar, Urmimala; Lee, Jane E; Nguyen, Kim H; Lisker, Sarah; Lyles, Courtney R.
  • Sarkar U; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Lee JE; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Nguyen KH; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Lisker S; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Lyles CR; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(9): e26623, 2021 09 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1443943
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prior studies have shown that virtual reality (VR) is an efficacious treatment modality for opioid-sparing pain management. However, the majority of these studies were conducted among primarily White, relatively advantaged populations and in well-resourced settings.

OBJECTIVE:

We conducted a qualitative, theory-informed implementation science study to assess the readiness for VR in safety-net settings.

METHODS:

Using the theoretical lens of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, we conducted semistructured interviews with current VR users and nonusers based in safety-net health systems (n=15). We investigated barriers and facilitators to a commercially available, previously validated VR technology platform AppliedVR (Los Angeles, CA, USA). We used deductive qualitative analysis using the overarching domains of the CFIR framework and performed open, inductive coding to identify specific themes within each domain.

RESULTS:

Interviewees deemed the VR intervention to be useful, scalable, and an appealing alternative to existing pain management approaches. Both users and nonusers identified a lack of reimbursement for VR as a significant challenge for adoption. Current users cited positive patient feedback, but safety-net stakeholders voiced concern that existing VR content may not be relevant or appealing to diverse patients. All respondents acknowledged the challenge of integrating and maintaining VR in current pain management workflows across a range of clinical settings, and this adoption challenge was particularly acute, given resource and staffing constraints in safety-net settings.

CONCLUSIONS:

VR for pain management holds interest for frontline pain management clinicians and leadership in safety-net health settings but will require significant tailoring and adaption to address the needs of diverse populations. Integration into complex workflows for pain management is a significant barrier to adoption, and participants cited structural cost and reimbursement concerns as impediments to initial implementation and scaling of VR use.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Virtual Reality Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Med Internet Res Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 26623

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Virtual Reality Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Med Internet Res Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 26623