Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Overcoming COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Insights from an Online Population-Based Survey in the United States.
Badr, Hoda; Zhang, Xiaotao; Oluyomi, Abiodun; Woodard, LeChauncy D; Adepoju, Omolola E; Raza, Syed Ahsan; Amos, Christopher I.
  • Badr H; Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Zhang X; Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Oluyomi A; Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Woodard LD; Department of Health Systems and Population Health Science, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
  • Adepoju OE; Humana Integrated Health System Sciences Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
  • Raza SA; Department of Health Systems and Population Health Science, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
  • Amos CI; Humana Integrated Health System Sciences Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(10)2021 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1444342
ABSTRACT
This study sought to identify individual-level determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). An online population-based survey was distributed in English and Spanish. Data were derived from 1208 U.S. adults (52% female; 38.7% minorities), 43.5% of whom reported vaccine hesitancy. Multivariable analysis revealed that unemployed individuals were more likely (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.16-2.73, p = 0.009) and married (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.81, p = 0.002) and higher income individuals (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84, p = 0.008) were less likely to be hesitant. Individuals with greater perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94, p = 0.006), who perceived vaccination as being convenient (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-1.00, p = 0.047), and who afforded greater importance to cues to action from government (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, p = 0.005), public health (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82, p < 0.001), and healthcare experts (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.50-0.69, p < 0.001) were also less likely to be hesitant. Findings suggest that HBM and TPB constructs may be useful in informing strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Specifically, framing appeals based on perceptions of COVID-19 susceptibility, making vaccination convenient, and rebuilding trust through unified cues to action may help to overcome vaccine hesitancy.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study Topics: Vaccines Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Vaccines9101100

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study Topics: Vaccines Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Vaccines9101100