Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Promoting physical distancing during COVID-19: a systematic approach to compare behavioral interventions.
Blanken, Tessa F; Tanis, Charlotte C; Nauta, Floor H; Dablander, Fabian; Zijlstra, Bonne J H; Bouten, Rick R M; Oostvogel, Quinten H; Boersma, Meier J; van der Steenhoven, Maya V; van Harreveld, Frenk; de Wit, Sanne; Borsboom, Denny.
  • Blanken TF; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.f.blanken@uva.nl.
  • Tanis CC; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Nauta FH; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dablander F; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Zijlstra BJH; Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bouten RRM; Focus Technologies B.V., 5657 EW, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Oostvogel QH; Focus Technologies B.V., 5657 EW, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Boersma MJ; Smart Distance Lab, 2353 NM, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
  • van der Steenhoven MV; Smart Distance Lab, 2353 NM, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
  • van Harreveld F; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Wit S; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Borsboom D; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 19463, 2021 09 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1447325
ABSTRACT
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, physical distancing behavior turned out to be key to mitigating the virus spread. Therefore, it is crucial that we understand how we can successfully alter our behavior and promote physical distancing. We present a framework to systematically assess the effectiveness of behavioral interventions to stimulate physical distancing. In addition, we demonstrate the feasibility of this framework in a large-scale natural experiment (N = 639) conducted during an art fair. In an experimental design, we varied interventions to evaluate the effect of face masks, walking directions, and immediate feedback on visitors' contacts. We represent visitors as nodes, and their contacts as links in a contact network. Subsequently, we used network modelling to test for differences in these contact networks. We find no evidence that face masks influence physical distancing, while unidirectional walking directions and buzzer feedback do positively impact physical distancing. This study offers a feasible way to optimize physical distancing interventions through scientific research. As such, the presented framework provides society with the means to directly evaluate interventions, so that policy can be based on evidence rather than conjecture.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Behavior / Physical Distancing / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-98964-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Behavior / Physical Distancing / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-98964-z