Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Results of Transarterial Embolization for Treating Type 2 Endoleaks: A Single-Center Experience.
Arenas Azofra, Ernesto; Rey, Vicente Mosquera; Marcos, Francisco Álvarez; Al-Sibbai, Amer Zanabili; García, Florentino Vega; Pérez, Manuel Alonso.
  • Arenas Azofra E; Vascular Surgery Department, Asturias University Central Hospital (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain. Electronic address: ernesto.arenas@usal.es.
  • Rey VM; Vascular Surgery Department, Asturias University Central Hospital (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
  • Marcos FÁ; Vascular Surgery Department, Asturias University Central Hospital (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
  • Al-Sibbai AZ; Vascular Surgery Department, Asturias University Central Hospital (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
  • García FV; Radiology Department, Asturias University Central Hospital (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
  • Pérez MA; Vascular Surgery Department, Asturias University Central Hospital (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 104-109, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1454026
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Type 2 endoleaks (T2Es) are the main cause of reintervention after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The objective of this study is to quantify success rates of T2E treatment.

METHODS:

This study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database containing data on all consecutive patients treated for a T2E between 2003 and 2017 in a single center. Technical success was defined as absence of endoleak in the final angiographic control after treatment. Clinical success was defined as absence of sac growth over 5 mm in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography performed a year thereafter. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS:

A total of 528 elective EVARs were performed in the period. Thirty-six of these (6.8%) developed a T2E requiring reintervention, a median of 37.9 months after EVAR. Twenty-five percent of the treatments were performed more than 5 years after intervention. Twenty-eight of the 36 treatments were performed via transarterial embolization. For this technique, technical success was 71.4% and clinical success was 62.5%. A subsequent reintervention was required in 35.7% of patients. In this cohort, the rate of aneurysm rupture was 10.7% (n = 3/28), open surgical conversion was needed in 2 of 28 cases (7.1%), and rate of aneurysm-related death was 14.3% (n = 4/28) over follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

A high percentage of patients are at risk of adverse outcomes after T2E treatment. Strict imaging follow-up is still needed in this population.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Embolization, Therapeutic / Endoleak / Endovascular Procedures Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Journal subject: Vascular Diseases Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Embolization, Therapeutic / Endoleak / Endovascular Procedures Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Journal subject: Vascular Diseases Year: 2020 Document Type: Article