Diagnostic accuracy of current machine learning classifiers for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy of current machine learning classifiers for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Artificial intelligence diagnostic algorithms can automatically detect and diagnose AMD through training data from large sets of fundus or OCT images. The use of AI algorithms is a powerful tool, and it is a method of obtaining a cost-effective, simple, and fast diagnosis of AMD. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were searched systematically and thoroughly. Conferences held through Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, and Canadian Society of Ophthalmology were searched. Studies were screened using Covidence software and data on sensitivity, specificity and area under curve were extracted from the included studies. STATA 15.0 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our search strategy identified 307 records from online databases and 174 records from gray literature. Total of 13 records, 64,798 subjects (and 612,429 images), were used for the quantitative analysis. The pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.918 [95% CI 0.678, 0.98] and specificity was 0.888 [95% CI 0.578, 0.98] for AMD screening using machine learning classifiers. The relative odds of a positive screen test in AMD cases were 89.74 [95% CI 3.05-2641.59] times more likely than a negative screen test in non-AMD cases. The positive likelihood ratio was 8.22 [95% CI 1.52-44.48] and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 [95% CI 0.02-0.52]. CONCLUSION: The included studies show promising results for the diagnostic accuracy of the machine learning classifiers for AMD and its implementation in clinical settings.