Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Safety and efficacy of digital chest drainage units compared to conventional chest drainage units in cardiac surgery.
Saha, Shekhar; Hofmann, Sandra; Jebran, Ahmad Fawad; Waezi, Narges; Kutschka, Ingo; Friedrich, Martin G; Niehaus, Heidi.
  • Saha S; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Hofmann S; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
  • Jebran AF; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Waezi N; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Kutschka I; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Friedrich MG; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Niehaus H; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 31(1): 42-47, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1455304
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The use of digital chest drainage units (CDUs) has become increasingly common in thoracic surgery due to several advantages. However, in cardiac surgery, its use is still limited in favour of conventional analogue CDUs. In order to investigate the potential benefit of digital CDUs in cardiac surgery, we compared the safety and efficacy of both systems in patients undergoing cardiac surgery at our centre.

METHODS:

We retrospectively investigated 265 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution between June 2017 and October 2017. These patients were divided into 2 groups patients with analogue (A, n = 65) and digital CDUs (D, n = 200). Postoperative outcome was analysed and compared between both groups. In addition, the 'user experience' was evaluated by means of a questionnaire.

RESULTS:

The median age of the cohort was 70 years (P = 0.167), 25.3% of patients were female (P = 0.414). There were no differences in terms of re-explorative surgery or use of blood products. Nor was there a difference in the overall amount of fluid collected. However, during the first 6 h, more fluid was collected by the digital CDUs. The overall rate of technical failure was 0.4%. We observed a significantly higher rate of clotting in the tubing system of the digital CDUs (P = 0.042). Concerning the user experience, the digital CDUs were associated with a more favourable ease of use on the regular wards (P < 0.001). With regard to the overall user experience, the digital CDUs outperformed the analogue systems (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS:

Digital CDUs can be safely and effectively applied in patients after cardiac surgery. Due to the improved patient mobility and simplified chest tube management, the use of digital CDUs may be advantageous for patients after cardiac surgery. However, the issue of clotting of the tubing systems should be addressed by further technical improvements.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Care / Chest Tubes / Drainage / Cardiac Surgical Procedures Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Journal subject: Vascular Diseases / Cardiology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Icvts

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Care / Chest Tubes / Drainage / Cardiac Surgical Procedures Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Journal subject: Vascular Diseases / Cardiology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Icvts