Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature.
Huang, Yinan; Talwar, Ashna; Chatterjee, Satabdi; Aparasu, Rajender R.
  • Huang Y; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Health & Sciences Bldg 2, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
  • Talwar A; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Health & Sciences Bldg 2, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
  • Chatterjee S; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Health & Sciences Bldg 2, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
  • Aparasu RR; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Road, Health & Sciences Bldg 2, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. rraparasu@uh.edu.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 21(1): 96, 2021 05 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1455917
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Advances in machine learning (ML) provide great opportunities in the prediction of hospital readmission. This review synthesizes the literature on ML methods and their performance for predicting hospital readmission in the US.

METHODS:

This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Statement. The extraction of items was also guided by the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). Electronic databases PUBMED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were systematically searched from January 1, 2015, through December 10, 2019. The articles were imported into COVIDENCE online software for title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility. Observational studies using ML techniques for hospital readmissions among US patients were eligible for inclusion. Articles without a full text available in the English language were excluded. A qualitative synthesis included study characteristics, ML algorithms utilized, and model validation, and quantitative analysis assessed model performance. Model performances in terms of Area Under the Curve (AUC) were analyzed using R software. Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the quality of the reviewed studies.

RESULTS:

Of 522 citations reviewed, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. A majority of the studies used electronic health records (24, 56%), followed by population-based data sources (15, 35%) and administrative claims data (4, 9%). The most common algorithms were tree-based methods (23, 53%), neural network (NN) (14, 33%), regularized logistic regression (12, 28%), and support vector machine (SVM) (10, 23%). Most of these studies (37, 85%) were of high quality. A majority of these studies (28, 65%) reported ML algorithms with an AUC above 0.70. There was a range of variability within AUC reported by these studies with a median of 0.68 (IQR 0.64-0.76; range 0.50-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS:

The ML algorithms involving tree-based methods, NN, regularized logistic regression, and SVM are commonly used to predict hospital readmission in the US. Further research is needed to compare the performance of ML algorithms for hospital readmission prediction.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Readmission / Machine Learning Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12874-021-01284-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Readmission / Machine Learning Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12874-021-01284-z