Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol.
Shoman, Haitham; Sandler, Simone; Peters, Alexander; Farooq, Ameer; Gruendl, Magdalen; Trinh, Shauna; Little, James; Woods, Alex; Bolton, William; Abioye, Abubakar; Ljungman, David.
  • Shoman H; Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Sandler S; Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Peters A; Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Farooq A; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
  • Gruendl M; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • Trinh S; Department of Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Little J; Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System-Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.
  • Woods A; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Bolton W; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
  • Abioye A; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Ljungman D; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Syst Rev ; 9(1): 98, 2020 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1455999
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gasless laparoscopy, developed in the early 1990s, was a means to minimize the clinical and financial challenges of pneumoperitoneum and general anaesthesia. It has been used in a variety of procedures such as in general surgery and gynecology procedures including diagnostic laparoscopy. There has been increasing evidence of the utility of gasless laparoscopy in resource limited settings where diagnostic imaging is not available. In addition, it may help save costs for hospitals. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence surrounding the safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy and open techniques and to analyze the benefits that gasless laparoscopy has for low resource setting hospitals.

METHODS:

This protocol is developed by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis-Protocols (PRISMA-P). The PRISMA statement guidelines and flowchart will be used to conduct the study itself. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Global Index Medicus (WHO) will be searched and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials database. The articles that will be found will be pooled into Covidence article manager software where all the records will be screened for eligibility and duplicates removed. A data extraction spreadsheet will be developed based on variables of interest set a priori. Reviewers will then screen all included studies based on the eligibility criteria. The GRADE tool will be used to assess the quality of the studies and the risk of bias in all the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk assessment tool. The RoB II tool will assed the risk of bias in randomized control studies and the ROBINS I will be used for the non-randomized studies.

DISCUSSION:

This study will be a comprehensive review on all published articles found using this search strategy on the safety and efficiency of the use of gasless laparoscopy. The systematic review outcomes will include safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to the use of conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study has been registered in PROSPERO under registration number CRD42017078338.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Syst Rev Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13643-020-01365-y

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Syst Rev Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13643-020-01365-y