Your browser doesn't support javascript.
To prevent being stressed-out: Allostatic overload and resilience of general practitioners in the era of COVID-19. A cross-sectional observational study.
Békési, Dóra; Teker, Illés; Torzsa, Péter; Kalabay, László; Rózsa, Sándor; Eory, Ajándék.
  • Békési D; Rácz Károly Clinical Medicine PhD School, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Teker I; Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Torzsa P; Department of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Kalabay L; Department of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Rózsa S; Washington University, St. Louis, USA.
  • Eory A; Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Budapest, Hungary.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 27(1): 277-285, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1462199
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Responsibility of general practitioners (GPs) in delivering safe and effective care is always high but during the COVID-19 pandemic they face even growing pressure that might result in unbearable stress load (allostatic overload, AO) leading to disease.

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to measure AO of Hungarian GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic and explore their recreational resources to identify potential protective factors against stress load.

METHODS:

In a mixed-method design, Fava's clinimetric approach to AO was applied alongside the Psychosocial Index (PSI); Kellner's symptom questionnaire (SQ) to measure depression, anxiety, hostility and somatisation and the Public Health Surveillance Well-being Scale (PHS-WB) to determine mental, social, and physical well-being. Recreational resources were mapped. Besides Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, regression analysis was applied to identify explanatory variables of AO.

RESULTS:

Data of 228 GPs (68% females) were analysed. Work-related changes caused the biggest challenges leading to AO in 60% of the sample. While female sex (OR 1.99; CI 1.06; 3.74, p = 0.032) and other life stresses (OR 1.4; CI 1.2; 1.6, p < 0.001) associated with increased odds of AO, each additional day with 30 min for recreation purposes associated with 20% decreased odds (OR 0.838; CI 0.72; 0.97, p = 0.020). 3-4 days a week when time was ensured for recreation associated with elevated mental and physical well-being, while 5-7 days associated with lower depressive and anxiety symptoms, somatisation, and hostility.

CONCLUSION:

Under changing circumstances, resilience improvement through increasing time spent on recreation should be emphasised to prevent GPs from the adverse health consequences of stress load.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Resilience, Psychological / General Practitioners / Occupational Stress / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Eur J Gen Pract Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 13814788.2021.1982889

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Resilience, Psychological / General Practitioners / Occupational Stress / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Eur J Gen Pract Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 13814788.2021.1982889