Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A health literacy analysis of the consumer-oriented COVID-19 information produced by ten state health departments.
Mani, Nandita S; Ottosen, Terri; Fratta, Megan; Yu, Fei.
  • Mani NS; nanditam@unc.edu, Associate University Librarian for Health Sciences, Director of the Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Ottosen T; ottosen@email.unc.edu, Community Engagement and Health Literacy Librarian, Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Fratta M; mfratta@email.unc.edu, Community Outreach & Global Health Librarian, Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Yu F; feifei@email.unc.edu, Health Informatics Librarian, Assistant Professor, Health Sciences Library, School of Information & Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Med Libr Assoc ; 109(3): 422-431, 2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1463960
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the public's need for quality health information that is understandable. This study aimed to identify (1) the extent to which COVID-19 messaging by state public health departments is understandable, actionable, and clear; (2) whether materials produced by public health departments are easily readable; (3) relationships between material type and understandability, actionability, clarity, and reading grade level; and (4) potential strategies to improve public health messaging around COVID-19.

METHODS:

Based on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention statistics from June 30, 2020, we identified the ten states with the most COVID-19 cases and selected forty-two materials (i.e., webpages, infographics, and videos) related to COVID-19 prevention according to predefined eligibility criteria. We applied three validated health literacy tools (i.e., Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, CDC Clear Communication Index, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level) to assess material understandability, actionability, clarity, and readability. We also analyzed correlations between scores on the three health literacy tools and material types.

RESULTS:

Overall, COVID-19 materials had high understandability and actionability but could be improved in terms of clarity and readability. Material type was significantly correlated with understandability, actionability, and clarity. Infographics and videos received higher scores on all tools.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on our findings, we recommend public health entities apply a combination of these tools when developing health information materials to improve their understandability, actionability, and clarity. We also recommend using infographics and videos when possible, taking a human-centered approach to information design, and providing multiple modes and platforms for information delivery.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Public Health / Health Education / Information Dissemination / Health Literacy / COVID-19 / Health Promotion Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Med Libr Assoc Journal subject: Library Science Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jmla.2021.1165

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Public Health / Health Education / Information Dissemination / Health Literacy / COVID-19 / Health Promotion Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Med Libr Assoc Journal subject: Library Science Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jmla.2021.1165