Inhibition of Estrogen Receptor Signaling as a Strategy for Radiosensitization of ER+ Breast Cancers

ABSTRACT

Purpose/Objective(s) Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is present in over 80% of breast tumors and has been shown to be a significant driver of tumor initiation and progression and therefore a target of first-line therapies for ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) patients. While both ionizing radiation (RT) and endocrine therapies (ET) are used for the treatment of women with ER+ BC, the sequencing of therapy and the effect of ET on tumor radiosensitization remains unclear. Here we assessed the efficacy and mechanism of ER inhibition in ER+ BC in combination with RT in multiple preclinical models. Materials/Methods: Clonogenic survival assays were used to assess radiosensitization. ER inhibition was accomplished with tamoxifen and the selective ER degrader (SERD), fulvestrant, in ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cells or ER-negative (ER-) SUM-159 cells. DNA damage was assessed by yH2AX foci. Efficiency of homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) was measured by RAD51 foci or using a pYFP reporter, respectively. Cell cycle effects were measured using flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI) staining. Apoptosis was assessed by annexin V/PI via flow cytometry. Western blotting was used to quantify protein expression. An MCF-7 xenograft model was used to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen with RT in vivo where mice were pretreated with tamoxifen for one or six days prior to starting RT. Synergy was determined using the fractional tumor volume method. Results: One-hour pretreatment with tamoxifen prior to RT resulted in radiosensitization of ER+ MCF-7 (enhR 1.14-1.50) and T47D (enhR 1.33-1.60) cells but not ER- SUM-159 cells (enhR 0.99-1.02). MCF-7 and T47D cells treated with tamoxifen and RT did not alter the kinetics of dsDNA break repair as measured by yH2AX foci (P > 0.05) but demonstrated a decrease in NHEJ-mediated repair (P < 0.05). No changes were observed in HR-mediated repair by Rad51 foci (P > 0.05). While cell cycle arrest was induced at 24 hours after RT, no changes were observed with tamoxifen treatment in combination with RT. In addition, there were no significant changes in apoptosis in MCF-7 or T47D cells with treatment of tamoxifen, RT, or the combination (P > 0.05). In vivo, an MCF-7 xenograft study demonstrated a significant delay in time to tumor doubling (17 days in control, 40 days with tamoxifen, 32 days with RT, and undefined with combination;P < 0.0001) and a significant difference in tumor growth between mice treated with tamoxifen or RT alone compared to mice treated with tamoxifen and RT with synergy noted with combination treatment. Conclusion: Our data suggest that endocrine therapies may be effectively used to radiosensitize ER+ breast tumors. This work also supports further clinical investigation of the timing of RT for patients receiving ET as concurrent use may be more effective than sequential, especially as ET prior to RT is increasingly used as a bridging therapy during the COVID pandemic.