Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study.
Winkel, Beatrice; Schram, Emma; Gremmels, Hendrik; Debast, Sylvia; Schuurman, Rob; Wensing, Annemarie; Bonten, Marc; Goedhart, Edwin; Hofstra, Marije.
  • Winkel B; Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Schram E; Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Gremmels H; Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Debast S; Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Isala, Zwolle, Overijssel, The Netherlands.
  • Schuurman R; Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Wensing A; Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Bonten M; Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Goedhart E; Royal Netherlands Football Association, KNVB, Zeist, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Hofstra M; Department of Medical Microbiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands l.m.hofstra-4@umcutrecht.nl.
BMJ Open ; 11(10): e048206, 2021 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1467702
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Antigen-based point-of-care tests for identification of SARS-CoV-2 may markedly enhance effectiveness of population-based controlling strategies. Previous studies have demonstrated >70% sensitivity and high specificity compared with reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR) in symptomatic individuals, but test performance for asymptomatic individuals is unknown.

METHODS:

Test performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott) was compared with RT-PCR in a longitudinal cohort study of asymptomatic football players and staff members of professional football clubs. Based on timing of symptoms and prior and subsequent test results, positive RT-PCR tests were categorised as presymptomatic, early or late infection, or persistent RNA shedding.

FINDINGS:

2425 tests were performed in 824 individuals, of which 52 (6.3%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive based on RT-PCR. There were 2406 paired sets from asymptomatic subjects for analysis. Sixteen Panbio tests were inconclusive, for which sensitivity analyses were performed (considering results as either positive or negative or being excluded). Sensitivity of Panbio for screening of asymptomatic individuals ranged from 80.0% (61.4-92.3) to 86.67% (69.2-96.2) and specificity from 99.53% (95% CI 99.2 to 99.8) to 100% (95% CI 99.8 to 100). Sensitivity of Panbio to detect subjects with presymptomatic/early infection (n=42) ranged from 81.82% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.8) to 90.91% (95% CI 78.3 to 97.5) with specificity always above 99%.

INTERPRETATION:

The Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test identifies 81%-90% of presymptomatic and early asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with high specificity. This test may therefore be adopted in testing strategies such as targeted screening of specific populations where prevalence is low.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-048206

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2020-048206