Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Surgery during COVID-19 crisis conditions: can we protect our ethical integrity against the odds?
Macleod, Jack; Mezher, Sermed; Hasan, Ragheb.
  • Macleod J; Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK jack.macleod@nhs.net.
  • Mezher S; Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
  • Hasan R; Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
J Med Ethics ; 46(8): 505-507, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1467731
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is reducing the ability to perform surgical procedures worldwide, giving rise to a multitude of ethical, practical and medical dilemmas. Adapting to crisis conditions requires a rethink of traditional best practices in surgical management, delving into an area of unknown risk profiles. Key challenging areas include cancelling elective operations, modifying procedures to adapt local services and updating the consenting process. We aim to provide an ethical rationale to support change in practice and guide future decision-making. Using the four principles approach as a structure, Medline was searched for existing ethical frameworks aimed at resolving conflicting moral duties. Where insufficient data were available, best guidance was sought from educational institutions National Health Service England and The Royal College of Surgeons. Multiple papers presenting high-quality, reasoned, ethical theory and practice guidance were collected. Using this as a basis to assess current practice, multiple requirements were generated to ensure preservation of ethical integrity when making management decisions. Careful consideration of ethical principles must guide production of local guidance ensuring consistent patient selection thus preserving equality as well as quality of clinical services. A critical issue is balancing the benefit of surgery against the unknown risk of developing COVID-19 and its associated complications. As such, the need for surgery must be sufficiently pressing to proceed with conventional or non-conventional operative management; otherwise, delaying intervention is justified. For delayed operations, it is our duty to quantify the long-term impact on patients' outcome within the constraints of pandemic management and its long-term outlook.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / General Surgery / Coronavirus Infections / Patient Selection / Health Equity / Decision Making / Ethics, Medical / Pandemics Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: J Med Ethics Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medethics-2020-106446

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / General Surgery / Coronavirus Infections / Patient Selection / Health Equity / Decision Making / Ethics, Medical / Pandemics Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: J Med Ethics Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medethics-2020-106446