Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Results of the CAPSID randomized trial for high-dose convalescent plasma in patients with severe COVID-19.
Körper, Sixten; Weiss, Manfred; Zickler, Daniel; Wiesmann, Thomas; Zacharowski, Kai; Corman, Victor M; Grüner, Beate; Ernst, Lucas; Spieth, Peter; Lepper, Philipp M; Bentz, Martin; Zinn, Sebastian; Paul, Gregor; Kalbhenn, Johannes; Dollinger, Matthias M; Rosenberger, Peter; Kirschning, Thomas; Thiele, Thomas; Appl, Thomas; Mayer, Benjamin; Schmidt, Michael; Drosten, Christian; Wulf, Hinnerk; Kruse, Jan Matthias; Jungwirth, Bettina; Seifried, Erhard; Schrezenmeier, Hubert.
  • Körper S; Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen and University Hospital Ulm, and Institute of Transfusion Medicine, and.
  • Weiss M; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Zickler D; Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  • Wiesmann T; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Zacharowski K; Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Corman VM; Institute of Virology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health and German Centre for Infection Research, Berlin, Germany.
  • Grüner B; Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital and Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Ernst L; Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  • Spieth P; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Lepper PM; Department of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology, Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
  • Bentz M; Department of Internal Medicine III, Hospital of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Zinn S; Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Paul G; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pneumology and Infectious Diseases, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Kalbhenn J; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Dollinger MM; Medical Clinic I, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
  • Rosenberger P; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Kirschning T; Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, University of Heidelberg, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Thiele T; Institute of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Appl T; Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen and University Hospital Ulm, and Institute of Transfusion Medicine, and.
  • Mayer B; Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Schmidt M; Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Drosten C; Institute of Virology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health and German Centre for Infection Research, Berlin, Germany.
  • Wulf H; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Kruse JM; Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  • Jungwirth B; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Seifried E; Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Schrezenmeier H; Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen and University Hospital Ulm, and Institute of Transfusion Medicine, and.
J Clin Invest ; 131(20)2021 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1470551
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDCOVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) has been considered a treatment option for COVID-19. This trial assessed the efficacy of a neutralizing antibody containing high-dose CCP in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support or intensive care treatment.METHODSPatients (n = 105) were randomized 11 to either receive standard treatment and 3 units of CCP or standard treatment alone. Control group patients with progress on day 14 could cross over to the CCP group. The primary outcome was a dichotomous composite outcome of survival and no longer fulfilling criteria for severe COVID-19 on day 21.ResultsThe primary outcome occurred in 43.4% of patients in the CCP group and 32.7% in the control group (P = 0.32). The median time to clinical improvement was 26 days in the CCP group and 66 days in the control group (P = 0.27). The median time to discharge from the hospital was 31 days in the CCP group and 51 days in the control group (P = 0.24). In the subgroup that received a higher cumulative amount of neutralizing antibodies, the primary outcome occurred in 56.0% of the patients (vs. 32.1%), with significantly shorter intervals to clinical improvement (20 vs. 66 days, P < 0.05) and to hospital discharge (21 vs. 51 days, P = 0.03) and better survival (day-60 probability of survival 91.6% vs. 68.1%, P = 0.02) in comparison with the control group.ConclusionCCP added to standard treatment was not associated with a significant improvement in the primary and secondary outcomes. A predefined subgroup analysis showed a significant benefit of CCP among patients who received a larger amount of neutralizing antibodies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04433910.FundingBundesministerium für Gesundheit (German Federal Ministry of Health) ZMVI1-2520COR802.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article