Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada.
Walsh, Liam; Hong, Sheng Chiong; Chalakkal, Renoh Johnson; Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
  • Walsh L; Department of Ophthalmology, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
  • Hong SC; Department of Ophthalmology, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
  • Chalakkal RJ; Research and Development, oDocs Eye Care, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
  • Ogbuehi KC; Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 15: 4015-4027, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1472370
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Over 700,000 New Zealanders (NZ), particularly elderly and Maori, live without timely access to specialist ophthalmology services. Teleophthalmology is a widely recognised tool that can assist in overcoming resource and distance barriers. Teleophthalmology gained unprecedented traction in NZ during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown. However, its provision is still limited and there are equity issues. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review identifying, describing and contrasting teleophthalmology services in NZ with the comparable countries of Australia, USA, Canada and the United Kingdom.

METHODS:

The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Google were systemically searched using the keywords telemedicine, ophthalmology, tele-ophthalmology/teleophthalmology. The searches were filtered to the countries above, with no time constraints. An integrative approach was used to synthesise findings.

RESULTS:

One hundred and thirty-two studies were identified describing 90 discrete teleophthalmology services. Articles spanned from 1997 to 2020. Models were categorised into general eye care (n=21; 16%); emergency/trauma (n=6; 4.5%); school screening (n=25; 19%); artificial intelligence (AI) (n=23; 18%); and disease-specific models of care (MOC) (n=57; 43%). The most common diseases addressed were diabetic retinopathy (n=23; 17%); retinopathy of prematurity (n=9; 7%); and glaucoma (n=8; 6%). Programs were mainly centred in the US (n=72; 54.5%), followed by the UK (n=29; 22%), then Canada (n=16; 12%), Australia (n=13; 10%), with the fewest identified in NZ (n=3; 2%). Models generally involved an ophthalmologist consultative service, remote supervision and triaging. Most models involved local clinicians transmitting fed-forward or live images.

CONCLUSION:

Teleophthalmology will likely play a crucial role in the future of eye care. COVID-19 has offered a unique opportunity to observe the use of teleophthalmology services globally. Feed-forward and, increasingly, live-based teleophthalmology services have demonstrated feasibility and cost-effectiveness in similar countries internationally. New Zealand's teleophthalmology services, however, are currently limited. Investing in strategic partnerships and technology at a national level can advance health equities in ophthalmic care.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: OPTH.S294428

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: OPTH.S294428