Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Health authorities' health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review.
Berg, Siv Hilde; O'Hara, Jane K; Shortt, Marie Therese; Thune, Henriette; Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten; Lungu, Daniel Adrian; Røislien, Jo; Wiig, Siri.
  • Berg SH; Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway. Siv.h.berg@uis.no.
  • O'Hara JK; Faculty of Medicine & Health, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
  • Shortt MT; Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Thune H; Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Brønnick KK; Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Lungu DA; Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Helse Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Røislien J; Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Wiig S; Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 1401, 2021 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1477357
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities' ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic.

METHODS:

We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria.

RESULTS:

The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities' use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices.

CONCLUSION:

Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities' videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype / Health Communication / Social Media / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-021-11468-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype / Health Communication / Social Media / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews Limits: Animals / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-021-11468-3