Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Diagnostic value of chest computed tomography imaging for COVID-19 based on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction: a meta-analysis.
Liu, Jing; Yang, Xue; Zhu, Yunxian; Zhu, Yi; Liu, Jingzhe; Zeng, Xiantao; Li, Hongjun.
  • Liu J; Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Infectious Diseases Hospital of Soochow University, The Fifth People's Hospital of Suzhou, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
  • Yang X; Department of Radiology, Beijing Youan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhu Y; Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Infectious Diseases Hospital of Soochow University, The Fifth People's Hospital of Suzhou, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhu Y; Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Infectious Diseases Hospital of Soochow University, The Fifth People's Hospital of Suzhou, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
  • Liu J; Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100016, People's Republic of China.
  • Zeng X; Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
  • Li H; Department of Radiology, Beijing Youan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China. lihongjun00113@ccmu.edu.cn.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 10(1): 126, 2021 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1477466
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The computed tomography (CT) diagnostic value of COVID-19 is controversial. We summarized the value of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 through a meta-analysis based on the reference standard.

METHODS:

All Chinese and English studies related to the diagnostic value of CT for COVID-19 across multiple publication platforms, was searched for and collected. Studies quality evaluation and plotting the risk of bias were estimated. A heterogeneity test and meta-analysis, including plotting sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe) forest plots, pooled positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), dignostic odds ratio (DOR) values and 95% confidence interval (CI), were estimated. If there was a threshold effect, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) was further plotted. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and 95% CI were also calculated.

RESULTS:

Twenty diagnostic studies that represented a total of 9004 patients were included from 20 pieces of literatures after assessing all the aggregated studies. The reason for heterogeneity was caused by the threshold effect, so the AUROC = 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) for chest CT of COVID-19. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, +LR, -LR from 20 studies were 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), 0.71 (95% CI 0.59-0.80), 3.1(95% CI 2.2-4.4), 0.12 (95% CI 0.09-0.17), separately. The I2 was 85.6% (P = 0.001) by Q-test.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study showed that CT diagnosis of COVID-19 was close to the reference standard. The diagnostic value of chest CT may be further enhanced if there is a unified COVID-19 diagnostic standard. However, please pay attention to rational use of CT.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thorax / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Infect Dis Poverty Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thorax / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Infect Dis Poverty Year: 2021 Document Type: Article