Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Educational Effect of Remote Lectures for Students Aiming to Become Radiologic Technologists: Questionnaire on Nuclear Medicine Examinations.
Nakaya, Koji; Yasuda, Eisuke; Muto, Hiroe; Matsuura, Kanae; Higashide, Ryo; Arai, Nobuyuki.
  • Nakaya K; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka, Japan nakaya@suzuka-u.ac.jp.
  • Yasuda E; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka, Japan.
  • Muto H; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka, Japan.
  • Matsuura K; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka, Japan.
  • Higashide R; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka, Japan.
  • Arai N; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka, Japan.
J Nucl Med Technol ; 49(2): 164-169, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1477743
ABSTRACT
In the latter half of 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began spreading worldwide. To prevent COVID-19 infection, all teaching at Suzuka University of Medical Sciences from April to June 2020 took place as remote lectures, not in the face-to-face format. This study analyzed postlecture questionnaire responses regarding face-to-face and remote teaching on the subject of nuclear medicine technology examinations. We examined the educational effect of using remote lectures.

Methods:

We conducted a questionnaire survey among students by means of a 5-point evaluation scale about satisfaction, comprehension, concentration, preparation, reviewing, and the question environment for face-to-face and remote lectures.

Results:

We present the results as means and SDs. Satisfaction results for face-to-face and remote lectures were 3.30 ± 0.72 and 3.36 ± 0.88, respectively. Comprehension results for face-to-face and remote lectures were 3.30 ± 0.71 and 3.30 ± 0.83, respectively. Concentration results for face-to-face and remote lectures were 3.50 ± 0.69 and 3.05 ± 0.90, respectively. The preparation results for face-to-face and remote lectures were 2.57 ± 0.88 and 2.67 ± 0.94, respectively. The reviewing results for face-to-face and remote lectures were 2.84 ± 0.85 and 3.39 ± 0.89, respectively. The question environment results for face-to-face and remote lectures lessons were 2.94 ± 0.90 and 3.43 ± 0.84, respectively. There were no significant differences between face-to-face and remote lectures in terms of satisfaction, comprehension, or preparation. There were significant differences between face-to-face and remote lectures in terms of concentration, reviewing, and the questioning environment (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

This comparative analysis of the postlecture questionnaire responses for face-to-face and remote formats in nuclear medicine technology examinations showed that remote lectures have a strong educational effect. We believe that, in future, remote lectures should be considered a tool in student education.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Education, Distance / Nuclear Medicine Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Nucl Med Technol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jnmt.120.258194

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Education, Distance / Nuclear Medicine Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Nucl Med Technol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jnmt.120.258194