Your browser doesn't support javascript.
An altmetric analysis of online news on India's first indigenous COVID-19 vaccine.
Royal, Abhishek; Ahmad, Sameena; Qureshi, Athar; Chaudhary, Vishal; Jindal, Tamanna; Kumar, Vaibhav; Mehta, Kedar.
  • Royal A; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  • Ahmad S; Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Qureshi A; Department of Marketing, Chetana's Institute of Management and Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  • Chaudhary V; Department of Physics, Bhagini Nivedita College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
  • Jindal T; Research Cell, Bhagini Nivedita College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
  • Kumar V; Department of Physics, Bhagini Nivedita College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
  • Mehta K; Department of Public Health Dentistry, TPCT'S Terna Dental College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
J Educ Health Promot ; 10: 348, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1478269
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Covaxin is the first indigenous vaccine developed in India against COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to analyze the news stories on Covaxin published in the online media between two statements issued by Indian Council for Medical Research on 2nd and 4th July for their content, quality of information, and reporting standards. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic search was performed on Google to identify the news stories related to Covaxin in the English language published between these two statements. The selected news stories were subjected to content analysis and reviewed using the screening points developed through a consultation by two independent experts using ten prevalidated criteria for health news review. The data were analyzed in MS Excel and StataMP14.

RESULTS:

The final analysis included 24 news stories. The mean and median score of the news stories is 10.71 and 12 (out of 20), respectively, with a score ranging from 2 to 17. The stories did not promote disease or vaccine mongering (100%), adequately mentioned the true novelty of the vaccine (95.8%), and source of the information (83.3%). However, they mostly failed to mention the information on costs, research data related to benefits, and harms and quality of the available evidence.

CONCLUSION:

There is a lack of reporting of detailed analysis about the methodology of development of the vaccine and limitations in its research design by health journalists. It is important to train journalists on proper reporting of health news to improve its quality in Indian media.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: J Educ Health Promot Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jehp.jehp_1603_20

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: J Educ Health Promot Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jehp.jehp_1603_20