Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Do mentoring programmes influence women's careers in the health and medical research sector? A mixed-methods evaluation of Australia's Franklin Women Mentoring Programme.
Vassallo, Amy; Walker, Karen; Georgousakis, Melina; Joshi, Rohina.
  • Vassallo A; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia AVassallo@georgeinstitute.org.au.
  • Walker K; Franklin Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Georgousakis M; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Joshi R; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 11(10): e052560, 2021 10 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1480254
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

It is known that women are under-represented in senior positions within the health and medical research sector. The Franklin Women Mentoring Programme (Programme) is a professionally facilitated, cross-organisational initiative designed to support career development for mid-career women. The objective of this study was to evaluate Programme outcomes reported by participants 12 months following its formal conclusion.

DESIGN:

Explanatory sequential mixed-methods study design using a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews.

SETTING:

Health and medical research institutes in Sydney, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS:

Health and medical researchers from the 2018 Programme. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Changes in knowledge, skills, behaviours and research metrics directly attributed to Programme participation.

RESULTS:

A total of 50 mentors and mentees participated in the cross-sectional survey (68% of the total cohort) and 14 mentors and mentees participated in the interviews. All reported changes to their knowledge, skills, behaviours and research metrics which were directly attributed to participation in the Programme. This included changes in knowledge and skills to be more inclusive (96% mentees, 83% mentors), resilience (88% mentees, 67% mentors), ability to have difficult workplace conversations (88% mentees, 71% mentors) and improvements in supervisory and team management (82% mentees, 75% mentors) skills. Positive impacts on promotions and grant opportunities were also reported. All evaluation participants believed this Programme was a worthwhile initiative for their workplaces to invest in.

CONCLUSION:

Participation in this cross-organisational, professionally facilitated, structured mentoring programme has led to positive outcomes for mentees, as well as mentors. Reported outcomes indicate the Programme is meeting its aims to support the career development of mid-career women in health and medical research, while facilitating a more inclusive workforce.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomedical Research / Mentoring Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-052560

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomedical Research / Mentoring Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-052560