Your browser doesn't support javascript.
An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis.
Sivayoham, Narani; Hussain, Adil N; Shabbo, Luke; Christie, Dylon.
  • Sivayoham N; Department of Emergency Medicine, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Hussain AN; Department of Emergency Medicine, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Shabbo L; Department of Emergency Medicine, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Christie D; Department of Emergency Medicine, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ann Med ; 53(1): 1863-1874, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1483235
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality.

METHOD:

A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data. Adult patients admitted from the ED after receiving intravenous antibiotics for suspected sepsis in the year 2020, were studied. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. The scores stated above were calculated for each patient. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for each score for the primary outcome measure, all-cause in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and cut-off points were identified by the statistical software. Scores above the cut-off point were deemed high-risk. The test characteristics of the high-risk groups were calculated. Comparisons were based on the AUROC curve and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk groups. Previously published cut-off points were also studied. Calibration was also studied.

RESULTS:

Of the 2594 patients studied, 332 (12.8%) died. The AUROC curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.75) was significantly greater than the AUROC curve for the SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49-0.53), p < .0001 and the NEWS2 score 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.70), p = .005, and similar to all other scores studied. Sensitivity for mortality at the respective cut-off points identified (REDS ≥3, NEWS2 ≥ 8, CURB65 ≥ 3, SOFA ≥3, MEDS ≥10 and PIRO ≥10) was greatest for the REDS score at 80.1% (95% CI 75.4-84.3) and significantly greater than the other scores. The sensitivity for mortality for an increase of two points from baseline in the SOFA score was 63% (95% CI 57.5-68.2).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this single centre study, the REDS score had either a greater AUROC curve or sensitivity for mortality compared to the comparator scores, at the respective cut-off points identified.KEY MESSAGESThe REDS score is a simple and objective scoring system to risk-stratify for mortality in emergency department (MED) patients with suspected sepsis.The REDS score is better or equivalent to existing scoring systems in its discrimination for mortality.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Severity of Illness Index / Sepsis / Emergency Service, Hospital / Intensive Care Units / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Ann Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 07853890.2021.1992495

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Severity of Illness Index / Sepsis / Emergency Service, Hospital / Intensive Care Units / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Ann Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 07853890.2021.1992495