Intrafraction error analysis of homemade mouth-bite masks in linac-based SRS for brain metastasis

ABSTRACT

Purpose or Objective To assess the intrafraction accuracy of a frameless stereotactic linac-based radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) using a homemade mouth-bite thermoplastic mask in combination with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and six-degrees of freedom (6-DOF) couchtop. Materials and Methods Covid-19 restrictions resulted in significant delays in the supply of the dedicated devices for BM SRS. A frameless approach using a homemade mouth-bite thermoplastic mask was implemented to offer BM SRS in a period of limited mobility (figure 1). All patients were immobilized and treated at the same institution with 6 MV FFF VMAT radiosurgery, with a 2 mm isotropic expansion from the GTV to the PTV. Before treatment delivery, patients underwent a low-dose CBCT to check position accuracy. Through image co-registration, translational (x, y, z) and rotational errors (roll, pitch, and yaw) were determined. The 6-DOF couchtop was used to automatically relocate the patient with sub-millimetric precision. Immediately after irradiation, patients underwent a second CBCT to verify any translational or rotational errors occurring during therapy (intrafraction motion). $Φg Results From February 2020 to January 2021 sixteen patients (29 lesions) received BM SRS (14-21 Gy). The whole procedure, from the first CBCT scan to the end of irradiation and subsequent CBCT, required a median time of 9 minutes [6-13]. Mean translational error was 0.0 ± 0.3 mm [-0.7;0.9] in lateral direction, and -0.1 ± 0.5 mm [-1.4;1.0] in longitudinal direction. A 2.2 mm maximum shift was recorded on the vertical axis, nevertheless the mean translation error was 0.1 ± 0.6 mm. Roll, pitch and yaw registered a mean value of -0.1 ± 0.3° [-0.8;0.2], 0.0 ± 0.2° [-0.8;0.2], and -0.1 ± 0.3° [-0.8;0.4], respectively. The results are summarized in figure 2. Conclusion This study demonstrated that homemade mouth-bite thermoplastic masks combined with CBCT, 6-DOF couchtop, and fast FFF treatment delivery allow minimal intra-fraction uncertainties in BM SRS, confirming the accuracy of PTV margin definition. The results are comparable to the declared specifics of SRS dedicated commercial frameless mask, while improving patient's comfort compared to the invasive fixed frame. However, the moulding procedure requires improved RTT skills and expertise. Our findings show that SRS can be safely delivered in radiotherapy units without dedicated expensive installations, such as CyberKnife and Gamma Knife, thus reducing patient mobility according to Covid-19 restrictions.